Ling 3.1 FlashvsMiMo v2.6 Flash

Ling 3.1 Flash leads the overall Podium Score by 0.1 points (88.5 vs 88.4).Category wins: Ling 3.1 Flash 0 — 7 MiMo v2.6 Flash.MiMo v2.6 Flash is the cheaper pick ($0.3/M vs $0.8/M per 1M output tokens). Ling 3.1 Flash is faster (175 t/s vs 118 t/s).

Open in Compare Tool →View Ling 3.1 FlashView MiMo v2.6 Flash
Ling 3.1 FlashDrag slider or hover to compareMiMo v2.6 Flash
MiMo v2.6 Flash
88.4
Coding: 86.0 · Speed: 118 t/s
Output Price: $0.3/M
Ling 3.1 Flash
88.5
Coding: 50.0 · Speed: 175 t/s
Output Price: $0.8/M
Quick VerdictAggregated 2026 Benchmark Analysis

Ling 3.1 Flash is rated higher overall with a Podium Score of 88.5 (vs 88.4 for MiMo v2.6 Flash). In head-to-head domain evaluations, MiMo v2.6 Flash outperforms in 7 of 7 benchmark categories.

Coding & Engineering
MiMo v2.6 Flash (86.0)
Inference Speed
Ling 3.1 Flash (175 t/s)
Cost Efficiency
MiMo v2.6 Flash ($0.3/M)
API Price / 1M (in · out)
Ling 3.1 Flash $0.15/M · $0.8/M — MiMo v2.6 Flash $0.1/M · $0.3/M

Choose Ling 3.1 Flash for low-latency applications, and MiMo v2.6 Flash for long documents and large codebases.

MetricLing 3.1 FlashMiMo v2.6 Flash
Podium Score88.5 ▲88.4
Arena Elo14181425 ▲
Intelligence Index56.088.0 ▲
Coding50.086.0 ▲
Math78.085.0 ▲
Reasoning85.087.0 ▲
Agentic58.084.0 ▲
Knowledge42.084.0 ▲
Multimodal40.087.0 ▲
Long-context68.095.0 ▲
Output speed175 t/s ▲118 t/s
Output price$0.8/M$0.3/M ▲
Context window131K1000K ▲
Scores aggregated from five independent leaderboards. See Methodology. More head-to-heads: Ling 3.1 Flash vs Claude Mythos · Ling 3.1 Flash vs Claude 5.5 Sonnet · Ling 3.1 Flash vs Kimi K3.1 Pro · Ling 3.1 Flash vs Eleven Multilingual v3
0 / 4
Compare Now →