Eleven Multilingual v3vsLing 3.1 Flash

Eleven Multilingual v3 leads the overall Podium Score by 5.5 points (94.0 vs 88.5).Category wins: Eleven Multilingual v3 3 — 4 Ling 3.1 Flash.Eleven Multilingual v3 is the cheaper pick ($0.05/M vs $0.8/M per 1M output tokens). Eleven Multilingual v3 is faster (200 t/s vs 175 t/s).

Eleven Multilingual v3Drag slider or hover to compareLing 3.1 Flash
Ling 3.1 Flash
88.5
Coding: 50.0 · Speed: 175 t/s
Output Price: $0.8/M
Eleven Multilingual v3
94.0
Coding: 0.0 · Speed: 200 t/s
Output Price: $0.05/M
Quick VerdictAggregated 2026 Benchmark Analysis

Eleven Multilingual v3 is rated higher overall with a Podium Score of 94.0 (vs 88.5 for Ling 3.1 Flash). In head-to-head domain evaluations, Ling 3.1 Flash outperforms in 4 of 7 benchmark categories.

Coding & Engineering
Ling 3.1 Flash (50.0)
Inference Speed
Eleven Multilingual v3 (200 t/s)
Cost Efficiency
Eleven Multilingual v3 ($0.05/M)
API Price / 1M (in · out)
Eleven Multilingual v3 $0.025/M · $0.05/M — Ling 3.1 Flash $0.15/M · $0.8/M

Choose Eleven Multilingual v3 for vision and multimodal apps, and Ling 3.1 Flash for complex reasoning and analysis.

MetricEleven Multilingual v3Ling 3.1 Flash
Podium Score94.0 ▲88.5
Arena Elo1485 ▲1418
Intelligence Index94.0 ▲56.0
Coding0.050.0 ▲
Math0.078.0 ▲
Reasoning35.085.0 ▲
Agentic65.0 ▲58.0
Knowledge48.0 ▲42.0
Multimodal95.0 ▲40.0
Long-context45.068.0 ▲
Output speed200 t/s ▲175 t/s
Output price$0.05/M ▲$0.8/M
Context window32K131K ▲
0 / 4