Kimi K3.1 ProvsLing 3.1 Flash
Kimi K3.1 Pro leads the overall Podium Score by 5.7 points (94.2 vs 88.5).Category wins: Kimi K3.1 Pro 7 — 0 Ling 3.1 Flash.Ling 3.1 Flash is the cheaper pick ($0.8/M vs $20/M per 1M output tokens). Ling 3.1 Flash is faster (175 t/s vs 45 t/s).
Kimi K3.1 ProDrag slider or hover to compareLing 3.1 Flash
Quick VerdictAggregated 2026 Benchmark Analysis
Kimi K3.1 Pro is rated higher overall with a Podium Score of 94.2 (vs 88.5 for Ling 3.1 Flash). In head-to-head domain evaluations, Kimi K3.1 Pro outperforms in 7 of 7 benchmark categories.
Coding & Engineering
Kimi K3.1 Pro (72.0)
Inference Speed
Ling 3.1 Flash (175 t/s)
Cost Efficiency
Ling 3.1 Flash ($0.8/M)
API Price / 1M (in · out)
Kimi K3.1 Pro $4/M · $20/M — Ling 3.1 Flash $0.15/M · $0.8/M
Choose Kimi K3.1 Pro for long documents and large codebases, and Ling 3.1 Flash for cost-sensitive workloads.
| Metric | Kimi K3.1 Pro | Ling 3.1 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Podium Score | 94.2 ▲ | 88.5 |
| Arena Elo | 1490 ▲ | 1418 |
| Intelligence Index | 68.0 ▲ | 56.0 |
| Coding | 72.0 ▲ | 50.0 |
| Math | 95.0 ▲ | 78.0 |
| Reasoning | 98.0 ▲ | 85.0 |
| Agentic | 82.0 ▲ | 58.0 |
| Knowledge | 45.0 ▲ | 42.0 |
| Multimodal | 96.0 ▲ | 40.0 |
| Long-context | 100.0 ▲ | 68.0 |
| Output speed | 45 t/s | 175 t/s ▲ |
| Output price | $20/M | $0.8/M ▲ |
| Context window | 1000K ▲ | 131K |
Scores aggregated from five independent leaderboards. See Methodology. More head-to-heads: Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Claude Mythos · Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Claude 5.5 Sonnet · Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Eleven Multilingual v3 · Kimi K3.1 Pro vs FLUX.2 Pro