Claude 5.5 SonnetvsLing 3.1 Flash

Claude 5.5 Sonnet leads the overall Podium Score by 6.3 points (94.8 vs 88.5).Category wins: Claude 5.5 Sonnet 7 — 0 Ling 3.1 Flash.Ling 3.1 Flash is the cheaper pick ($0.8/M vs $15/M per 1M output tokens). Ling 3.1 Flash is faster (175 t/s vs 94 t/s).

Open in Compare Tool →View Claude 5.5 SonnetView Ling 3.1 Flash
Claude 5.5 SonnetDrag slider or hover to compareLing 3.1 Flash
Ling 3.1 Flash
88.5
Coding: 50.0 · Speed: 175 t/s
Output Price: $0.8/M
Claude 5.5 Sonnet
94.8
Coding: 91.5 · Speed: 94 t/s
Output Price: $15/M
Quick VerdictAggregated 2026 Benchmark Analysis

Claude 5.5 Sonnet is rated higher overall with a Podium Score of 94.8 (vs 88.5 for Ling 3.1 Flash). In head-to-head domain evaluations, Claude 5.5 Sonnet outperforms in 7 of 7 benchmark categories.

Coding & Engineering
Claude 5.5 Sonnet (91.5)
Inference Speed
Ling 3.1 Flash (175 t/s)
Cost Efficiency
Ling 3.1 Flash ($0.8/M)
API Price / 1M (in · out)
Claude 5.5 Sonnet $3/M · $15/M — Ling 3.1 Flash $0.15/M · $0.8/M

Choose Claude 5.5 Sonnet for long documents and large codebases, and Ling 3.1 Flash for cost-sensitive workloads.

MetricClaude 5.5 SonnetLing 3.1 Flash
Podium Score94.8 ▲88.5
Arena Elo1520 ▲1418
Intelligence Index95.0 ▲56.0
Coding91.5 ▲50.0
Math94.2 ▲78.0
Reasoning95.0 ▲85.0
Agentic89.4 ▲58.0
Knowledge88.0 ▲42.0
Multimodal96.0 ▲40.0
Long-context98.0 ▲68.0
Output speed94 t/s175 t/s ▲
Output price$15/M$0.8/M ▲
Context window1000K ▲131K
Scores aggregated from five independent leaderboards. See Methodology. More head-to-heads: Claude 5.5 Sonnet vs Claude Mythos · Claude 5.5 Sonnet vs Kimi K3.1 Pro · Claude 5.5 Sonnet vs Eleven Multilingual v3 · Claude 5.5 Sonnet vs FLUX.2 Pro
0 / 4
Compare Now →