Claude Mythos PreviewvsLing 3.1 Flash

Claude Mythos Preview leads the overall Podium Score by 8.9 points (97.4 vs 88.5).Category wins: Claude Mythos Preview 5 — 0 Ling 3.1 Flash.Ling 3.1 Flash is the cheaper pick ($0.8/M vs $15/M per 1M output tokens). Ling 3.1 Flash is faster (175 t/s vs 80 t/s).

Claude Mythos PreviewDrag slider or hover to compareLing 3.1 Flash
Ling 3.1 Flash
88.5
Coding: 50.0 · Speed: 175 t/s
Output Price: $0.8/M
Claude Mythos Preview
97.4
Coding: 80.9 · Speed: 80 t/s
Output Price: $15/M
Quick VerdictAggregated 2026 Benchmark Analysis

Claude Mythos Preview is rated higher overall with a Podium Score of 97.4 (vs 88.5 for Ling 3.1 Flash). In head-to-head domain evaluations, Claude Mythos Preview outperforms in 5 of 7 benchmark categories.

Coding & Engineering
Claude Mythos Preview (80.9)
Inference Speed
Ling 3.1 Flash (175 t/s)
Cost Efficiency
Ling 3.1 Flash ($0.8/M)
API Price / 1M (in · out)
Claude Mythos $3/M · $15/M — Ling 3.1 Flash $0.15/M · $0.8/M

Choose Claude Mythos Preview for math and quantitative work, and Ling 3.1 Flash for cost-sensitive workloads.

MetricClaude Mythos PreviewLing 3.1 Flash
Podium Score97.4 ▲88.5
Arena Elo—1418
Intelligence Index—56.0
Coding80.9 ▲50.0
Math100.0 ▲78.0
Reasoning98.8 ▲85.0
Agentic—58.0
Knowledge100.0 ▲42.0
Multimodal100.0 ▲40.0
Long-context—68.0
Output speed80 t/s175 t/s ▲
Output price$15/M$0.8/M ▲
Context window1000K ▲131K
0 / 4