Ling 3.1 FlashvsFLUX.2 Klein 9B

Ling 3.1 Flash leads the overall Podium Score by 0.3 points (88.5 vs 88.2).Category wins: Ling 3.1 Flash 5 — 2 FLUX.2 Klein 9B.FLUX.2 Klein 9B is the cheaper pick ($0.02/M vs $0.8/M per 1M output tokens). Ling 3.1 Flash is faster (175 t/s vs 55 t/s).

Open in Compare Tool →View Ling 3.1 FlashView FLUX.2 Klein 9B
Ling 3.1 FlashDrag slider or hover to compareFLUX.2 Klein 9B
FLUX.2 Klein 9B
88.2
Coding: 0.0 · Speed: 55 t/s
Output Price: $0.02/M
Ling 3.1 Flash
88.5
Coding: 50.0 · Speed: 175 t/s
Output Price: $0.8/M
Quick VerdictAggregated 2026 Benchmark Analysis

Ling 3.1 Flash is rated higher overall with a Podium Score of 88.5 (vs 88.2 for FLUX.2 Klein 9B). In head-to-head domain evaluations, Ling 3.1 Flash outperforms in 5 of 7 benchmark categories.

Coding & Engineering
Ling 3.1 Flash (50.0)
Inference Speed
Ling 3.1 Flash (175 t/s)
Cost Efficiency
FLUX.2 Klein 9B ($0.02/M)
API Price / 1M (in · out)
Ling 3.1 Flash $0.15/M · $0.8/M — FLUX.2 Klein 9B $0.02/M · $0.02/M

Choose Ling 3.1 Flash for complex reasoning and analysis, and FLUX.2 Klein 9B for vision and multimodal apps.

MetricLing 3.1 FlashFLUX.2 Klein 9B
Podium Score88.5 ▲88.2
Arena Elo1418 ▲1405
Intelligence Index56.088.0 ▲
Coding50.0 ▲0.0
Math78.0 ▲0.0
Reasoning85.0 ▲32.0
Agentic58.0 ▲22.0
Knowledge42.050.0 ▲
Multimodal40.094.0 ▲
Long-context68.0 ▲45.0
Output speed175 t/s ▲55 t/s
Output price$0.8/M$0.02/M ▲
Context window131K ▲64K
Scores aggregated from five independent leaderboards. See Methodology. More head-to-heads: Ling 3.1 Flash vs Claude Mythos · Ling 3.1 Flash vs Claude 5.5 Sonnet · Ling 3.1 Flash vs Kimi K3.1 Pro · Ling 3.1 Flash vs Eleven Multilingual v3
0 / 4
Compare Now →