Wan 2.2 A14BvsQwen3.5 Max Preview

Wan 2.2 A14B leads the overall Podium Score by 14.4 points (87.4 vs 73.0).Category wins: Wan 2.2 A14B 0 — 0 Qwen3.5 Max Preview.Wan 2.2 A14B is the cheaper pick ($0.06/M vs $2/M per 1M output tokens). Qwen3.5 Max Preview is faster (50 t/s vs 15 t/s).

Open in Compare Tool →View Wan 2.2 A14BView Qwen3.5 Max
Wan 2.2 A14BDrag slider or hover to compareQwen3.5 Max Preview
Qwen3.5 Max Preview
73.0
Coding: — · Speed: 50 t/s
Output Price: $2/M
Wan 2.2 A14B
87.4
Coding: 0.0 · Speed: 15 t/s
Output Price: $0.06/M
Quick VerdictAggregated 2026 Benchmark Analysis

Wan 2.2 A14B is rated higher overall with a Podium Score of 87.4 (vs 73.0 for Qwen3.5 Max Preview). Both models show closely matched capabilities across domain benchmarks.

Coding & Engineering
Comparable
Inference Speed
Qwen3.5 Max Preview (50 t/s)
Cost Efficiency
Wan 2.2 A14B ($0.06/M)
API Price / 1M (in · out)
Wan 2.2 A14B $0.06/M · $0.06/M — Qwen3.5 Max $0.5/M · $2/M

Choose Wan 2.2 A14B for cost-sensitive workloads, and Qwen3.5 Max Preview for low-latency applications.

MetricWan 2.2 A14BQwen3.5 Max Preview
Podium Score87.4 ▲73.0
Arena Elo1415—
Intelligence Index87.0—
Coding0.0—
Math0.0—
Reasoning35.0—
Agentic20.0—
Knowledge55.0—
Multimodal96.0—
Long-context45.0—
Output speed15 t/s50 t/s ▲
Output price$0.06/M ▲$2/M
Context window64K128K ▲
Scores aggregated from five independent leaderboards. See Methodology. More head-to-heads: Wan 2.2 A14B vs Claude Mythos · Wan 2.2 A14B vs Claude 5.5 Sonnet · Wan 2.2 A14B vs Kimi K3.1 Pro · Wan 2.2 A14B vs Eleven Multilingual v3
0 / 4
Compare Now →