Eleven Multilingual v3vsWan 2.2 A14B

Eleven Multilingual v3 leads the overall Podium Score by 6.6 points (94.0 vs 87.4).Category wins: Eleven Multilingual v3 1 — 2 Wan 2.2 A14B.Eleven Multilingual v3 is the cheaper pick ($0.05/M vs $0.06/M per 1M output tokens). Eleven Multilingual v3 is faster (200 t/s vs 15 t/s).

Eleven Multilingual v3Drag slider or hover to compareWan 2.2 A14B
Wan 2.2 A14B
87.4
Coding: 0.0 · Speed: 15 t/s
Output Price: $0.06/M
Eleven Multilingual v3
94.0
Coding: 0.0 · Speed: 200 t/s
Output Price: $0.05/M
Quick VerdictAggregated 2026 Benchmark Analysis

Eleven Multilingual v3 is rated higher overall with a Podium Score of 94.0 (vs 87.4 for Wan 2.2 A14B). In head-to-head domain evaluations, Wan 2.2 A14B outperforms in 2 of 7 benchmark categories.

Coding & Engineering
Eleven Multilingual v3 (0.0)
Inference Speed
Eleven Multilingual v3 (200 t/s)
Cost Efficiency
Eleven Multilingual v3 ($0.05/M)
API Price / 1M (in · out)
Eleven Multilingual v3 $0.025/M · $0.05/M — Wan 2.2 A14B $0.06/M · $0.06/M

Choose Eleven Multilingual v3 for autonomous agents and tool use, and Wan 2.2 A14B for vision and multimodal apps.

MetricEleven Multilingual v3Wan 2.2 A14B
Podium Score94.0 ▲87.4
Arena Elo1485 ▲1415
Intelligence Index94.0 ▲87.0
Coding0.00.0
Math0.00.0
Reasoning35.035.0
Agentic65.0 ▲20.0
Knowledge48.055.0 ▲
Multimodal95.096.0 ▲
Long-context45.045.0
Output speed200 t/s ▲15 t/s
Output price$0.05/M ▲$0.06/M
Context window32K64K ▲
0 / 4