Kimi K3.1 ProvsWan 2.2 A14B

Kimi K3.1 Pro leads the overall Podium Score by 6.8 points (94.2 vs 87.4).Category wins: Kimi K3.1 Pro 5 — 1 Wan 2.2 A14B.Wan 2.2 A14B is the cheaper pick ($0.06/M vs $20/M per 1M output tokens). Kimi K3.1 Pro is faster (45 t/s vs 15 t/s).

Kimi K3.1 ProDrag slider or hover to compareWan 2.2 A14B
Wan 2.2 A14B
87.4
Coding: 0.0 · Speed: 15 t/s
Output Price: $0.06/M
Kimi K3.1 Pro
94.2
Coding: 72.0 · Speed: 45 t/s
Output Price: $20/M
Quick VerdictAggregated 2026 Benchmark Analysis

Kimi K3.1 Pro is rated higher overall with a Podium Score of 94.2 (vs 87.4 for Wan 2.2 A14B). In head-to-head domain evaluations, Kimi K3.1 Pro outperforms in 5 of 7 benchmark categories.

Coding & Engineering
Kimi K3.1 Pro (72.0)
Inference Speed
Kimi K3.1 Pro (45 t/s)
Cost Efficiency
Wan 2.2 A14B ($0.06/M)
API Price / 1M (in · out)
Kimi K3.1 Pro $4/M · $20/M — Wan 2.2 A14B $0.06/M · $0.06/M

Choose Kimi K3.1 Pro for long documents and large codebases, and Wan 2.2 A14B for knowledge and factual QA.

MetricKimi K3.1 ProWan 2.2 A14B
Podium Score94.2 ▲87.4
Arena Elo1490 ▲1415
Intelligence Index68.087.0 ▲
Coding72.0 ▲0.0
Math95.0 ▲0.0
Reasoning98.0 ▲35.0
Agentic82.0 ▲20.0
Knowledge45.055.0 ▲
Multimodal96.096.0
Long-context100.0 ▲45.0
Output speed45 t/s ▲15 t/s
Output price$20/M$0.06/M ▲
Context window1000K ▲64K
0 / 4