Kimi K3.1 ProvsWan 2.2 A14B
Kimi K3.1 Pro leads the overall Podium Score by 6.8 points (94.2 vs 87.4).Category wins: Kimi K3.1 Pro 5 — 1 Wan 2.2 A14B.Wan 2.2 A14B is the cheaper pick ($0.06/M vs $20/M per 1M output tokens). Kimi K3.1 Pro is faster (45 t/s vs 15 t/s).
Kimi K3.1 ProDrag slider or hover to compareWan 2.2 A14B
Quick VerdictAggregated 2026 Benchmark Analysis
Kimi K3.1 Pro is rated higher overall with a Podium Score of 94.2 (vs 87.4 for Wan 2.2 A14B). In head-to-head domain evaluations, Kimi K3.1 Pro outperforms in 5 of 7 benchmark categories.
Coding & Engineering
Kimi K3.1 Pro (72.0)
Inference Speed
Kimi K3.1 Pro (45 t/s)
Cost Efficiency
Wan 2.2 A14B ($0.06/M)
API Price / 1M (in · out)
Kimi K3.1 Pro $4/M · $20/M — Wan 2.2 A14B $0.06/M · $0.06/M
Choose Kimi K3.1 Pro for long documents and large codebases, and Wan 2.2 A14B for knowledge and factual QA.
| Metric | Kimi K3.1 Pro | Wan 2.2 A14B |
|---|---|---|
| Podium Score | 94.2 ▲ | 87.4 |
| Arena Elo | 1490 ▲ | 1415 |
| Intelligence Index | 68.0 | 87.0 ▲ |
| Coding | 72.0 ▲ | 0.0 |
| Math | 95.0 ▲ | 0.0 |
| Reasoning | 98.0 ▲ | 35.0 |
| Agentic | 82.0 ▲ | 20.0 |
| Knowledge | 45.0 | 55.0 ▲ |
| Multimodal | 96.0 | 96.0 |
| Long-context | 100.0 ▲ | 45.0 |
| Output speed | 45 t/s ▲ | 15 t/s |
| Output price | $20/M | $0.06/M ▲ |
| Context window | 1000K ▲ | 64K |
Scores aggregated from five independent leaderboards. See Methodology. More head-to-heads: Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Claude Mythos · Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Claude 5.5 Sonnet · Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Eleven Multilingual v3 · Kimi K3.1 Pro vs FLUX.2 Pro