Wan 2.2 A14BvsQwen3.8 Max
Wan 2.2 A14B leads the overall Podium Score by 7.6 points (87.4 vs 79.8).Category wins: Wan 2.2 A14B 1 — 4 Qwen3.8 Max.Wan 2.2 A14B is the cheaper pick ($0.06/M vs $2/M per 1M output tokens). Qwen3.8 Max is faster (55 t/s vs 15 t/s).
Wan 2.2 A14BDrag slider or hover to compareQwen3.8 Max
Quick VerdictAggregated 2026 Benchmark Analysis
Wan 2.2 A14B is rated higher overall with a Podium Score of 87.4 (vs 79.8 for Qwen3.8 Max). In head-to-head domain evaluations, Qwen3.8 Max outperforms in 4 of 7 benchmark categories.
Coding & Engineering
Qwen3.8 Max (50.3)
Inference Speed
Qwen3.8 Max (55 t/s)
Cost Efficiency
Wan 2.2 A14B ($0.06/M)
API Price / 1M (in · out)
Wan 2.2 A14B $0.06/M · $0.06/M — Qwen3.8 Max $0.5/M · $2/M
Choose Wan 2.2 A14B for vision and multimodal apps, and Qwen3.8 Max for long documents and large codebases.
| Metric | Wan 2.2 A14B | Qwen3.8 Max |
|---|---|---|
| Podium Score | 87.4 ▲ | 79.8 |
| Arena Elo | 1415 | 1496 ▲ |
| Intelligence Index | 87.0 | — |
| Coding | 0.0 | 50.3 ▲ |
| Math | 0.0 | 5.0 ▲ |
| Reasoning | 35.0 | 66.3 ▲ |
| Agentic | 20.0 | — |
| Knowledge | 55.0 | — |
| Multimodal | 96.0 ▲ | 85.4 |
| Long-context | 45.0 | 99.2 ▲ |
| Output speed | 15 t/s | 55 t/s ▲ |
| Output price | $0.06/M ▲ | $2/M |
| Context window | 64K | 1000K ▲ |
Scores aggregated from five independent leaderboards. See Methodology. More head-to-heads: Wan 2.2 A14B vs Claude Mythos · Wan 2.2 A14B vs Claude 5.5 Sonnet · Wan 2.2 A14B vs Kimi K3.1 Pro · Wan 2.2 A14B vs Eleven Multilingual v3