Wan 2.2 A14BvsLTX-2.3 Fast

Wan 2.2 A14B leads the overall Podium Score by 1.2 points (87.4 vs 86.2).Category wins: Wan 2.2 A14B 4 — 0 LTX-2.3 Fast.LTX-2.3 Fast is the cheaper pick ($0.05/M vs $0.06/M per 1M output tokens). LTX-2.3 Fast is faster (60 t/s vs 15 t/s).

Open in Compare Tool →View Wan 2.2 A14BView LTX-2.3 Fast
Wan 2.2 A14BDrag slider or hover to compareLTX-2.3 Fast
LTX-2.3 Fast
86.2
Coding: 0.0 · Speed: 60 t/s
Output Price: $0.05/M
Wan 2.2 A14B
87.4
Coding: 0.0 · Speed: 15 t/s
Output Price: $0.06/M
Quick VerdictAggregated 2026 Benchmark Analysis

Wan 2.2 A14B is rated higher overall with a Podium Score of 87.4 (vs 86.2 for LTX-2.3 Fast). In head-to-head domain evaluations, Wan 2.2 A14B outperforms in 4 of 7 benchmark categories.

Coding & Engineering
Wan 2.2 A14B (0.0)
Inference Speed
LTX-2.3 Fast (60 t/s)
Cost Efficiency
LTX-2.3 Fast ($0.05/M)
API Price / 1M (in · out)
Wan 2.2 A14B $0.06/M · $0.06/M — LTX-2.3 Fast $0.05/M · $0.05/M

Choose Wan 2.2 A14B for vision and multimodal apps, and LTX-2.3 Fast for cost-sensitive workloads.

MetricWan 2.2 A14BLTX-2.3 Fast
Podium Score87.4 ▲86.2
Arena Elo1415 ▲1385
Intelligence Index87.0 ▲86.0
Coding0.00.0
Math0.00.0
Reasoning35.0 ▲30.0
Agentic20.020.0
Knowledge55.0 ▲45.0
Multimodal96.0 ▲93.0
Long-context45.0 ▲35.0
Output speed15 t/s60 t/s ▲
Output price$0.06/M$0.05/M ▲
Context window64K64K
Scores aggregated from five independent leaderboards. See Methodology. More head-to-heads: Wan 2.2 A14B vs Claude Mythos · Wan 2.2 A14B vs Claude 5.5 Sonnet · Wan 2.2 A14B vs Kimi K3.1 Pro · Wan 2.2 A14B vs Eleven Multilingual v3
0 / 4
Compare Now →