Wan 2.2 A14BvsElevenLabs v4 Turbo
Wan 2.2 A14B leads the overall Podium Score by 0.3 points (87.4 vs 87.1).Category wins: Wan 2.2 A14B 4 — 1 ElevenLabs v4 Turbo.ElevenLabs v4 Turbo is the cheaper pick ($0.03/M vs $0.06/M per 1M output tokens). ElevenLabs v4 Turbo is faster (220 t/s vs 15 t/s).
Wan 2.2 A14BDrag slider or hover to compareElevenLabs v4 Turbo
Quick VerdictAggregated 2026 Benchmark Analysis
Wan 2.2 A14B is rated higher overall with a Podium Score of 87.4 (vs 87.1 for ElevenLabs v4 Turbo). In head-to-head domain evaluations, Wan 2.2 A14B outperforms in 4 of 7 benchmark categories.
Coding & Engineering
Wan 2.2 A14B (0.0)
Inference Speed
ElevenLabs v4 Turbo (220 t/s)
Cost Efficiency
ElevenLabs v4 Turbo ($0.03/M)
API Price / 1M (in · out)
Wan 2.2 A14B $0.06/M · $0.06/M — ElevenLabs v4 Turbo $0.015/M · $0.03/M
Choose Wan 2.2 A14B for vision and multimodal apps, and ElevenLabs v4 Turbo for autonomous agents and tool use.
| Metric | Wan 2.2 A14B | ElevenLabs v4 Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Podium Score | 87.4 ▲ | 87.1 |
| Arena Elo | 1415 ▲ | 1395 |
| Intelligence Index | 87.0 | 87.0 |
| Coding | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Math | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Reasoning | 35.0 ▲ | 30.0 |
| Agentic | 20.0 | 70.0 ▲ |
| Knowledge | 55.0 ▲ | 50.0 |
| Multimodal | 96.0 ▲ | 94.0 |
| Long-context | 45.0 ▲ | 40.0 |
| Output speed | 15 t/s | 220 t/s ▲ |
| Output price | $0.06/M | $0.03/M ▲ |
| Context window | 64K ▲ | 32K |
Scores aggregated from five independent leaderboards. See Methodology. More head-to-heads: Wan 2.2 A14B vs Claude Mythos · Wan 2.2 A14B vs Claude 5.5 Sonnet · Wan 2.2 A14B vs Kimi K3.1 Pro · Wan 2.2 A14B vs Eleven Multilingual v3