Wan 2.2 A14BvsElevenLabs v4 Turbo

Wan 2.2 A14B leads the overall Podium Score by 0.3 points (87.4 vs 87.1).Category wins: Wan 2.2 A14B 4 — 1 ElevenLabs v4 Turbo.ElevenLabs v4 Turbo is the cheaper pick ($0.03/M vs $0.06/M per 1M output tokens). ElevenLabs v4 Turbo is faster (220 t/s vs 15 t/s).

Wan 2.2 A14BDrag slider or hover to compareElevenLabs v4 Turbo
ElevenLabs v4 Turbo
87.1
Coding: 0.0 · Speed: 220 t/s
Output Price: $0.03/M
Wan 2.2 A14B
87.4
Coding: 0.0 · Speed: 15 t/s
Output Price: $0.06/M
Quick VerdictAggregated 2026 Benchmark Analysis

Wan 2.2 A14B is rated higher overall with a Podium Score of 87.4 (vs 87.1 for ElevenLabs v4 Turbo). In head-to-head domain evaluations, Wan 2.2 A14B outperforms in 4 of 7 benchmark categories.

Coding & Engineering
Wan 2.2 A14B (0.0)
Inference Speed
ElevenLabs v4 Turbo (220 t/s)
Cost Efficiency
ElevenLabs v4 Turbo ($0.03/M)
API Price / 1M (in · out)
Wan 2.2 A14B $0.06/M · $0.06/M — ElevenLabs v4 Turbo $0.015/M · $0.03/M

Choose Wan 2.2 A14B for vision and multimodal apps, and ElevenLabs v4 Turbo for autonomous agents and tool use.

MetricWan 2.2 A14BElevenLabs v4 Turbo
Podium Score87.4 ▲87.1
Arena Elo1415 ▲1395
Intelligence Index87.087.0
Coding0.00.0
Math0.00.0
Reasoning35.0 ▲30.0
Agentic20.070.0 ▲
Knowledge55.0 ▲50.0
Multimodal96.0 ▲94.0
Long-context45.0 ▲40.0
Output speed15 t/s220 t/s ▲
Output price$0.06/M$0.03/M ▲
Context window64K ▲32K
0 / 4