Simba 3.2vsElevenLabs v4 Turbo

Simba 3.2 leads the overall Podium Score by 0.7 points (87.8 vs 87.1).Category wins: Simba 3.2 4 — 1 ElevenLabs v4 Turbo.ElevenLabs v4 Turbo is the cheaper pick ($0.03/M vs $10/M per 1M output tokens). ElevenLabs v4 Turbo is faster (220 t/s vs 62 t/s).

Simba 3.2Drag slider or hover to compareElevenLabs v4 Turbo
ElevenLabs v4 Turbo
87.1
Coding: 0.0 · Speed: 220 t/s
Output Price: $0.03/M
Simba 3.2
87.8
Coding: 62.0 · Speed: 62 t/s
Output Price: $10/M
Quick VerdictAggregated 2026 Benchmark Analysis

Simba 3.2 is rated higher overall with a Podium Score of 87.8 (vs 87.1 for ElevenLabs v4 Turbo). In head-to-head domain evaluations, Simba 3.2 outperforms in 4 of 7 benchmark categories.

Coding & Engineering
Simba 3.2 (62.0)
Inference Speed
ElevenLabs v4 Turbo (220 t/s)
Cost Efficiency
ElevenLabs v4 Turbo ($0.03/M)
API Price / 1M (in · out)
Simba 3.2 $2/M · $10/M — ElevenLabs v4 Turbo $0.015/M · $0.03/M

Choose Simba 3.2 for complex reasoning and analysis, and ElevenLabs v4 Turbo for vision and multimodal apps.

MetricSimba 3.2ElevenLabs v4 Turbo
Podium Score87.8 ▲87.1
Arena Elo1400 ▲1395
Intelligence Index62.087.0 ▲
Coding62.0 ▲0.0
Math84.0 ▲0.0
Reasoning88.0 ▲30.0
Agentic70.070.0
Knowledge50.050.0
Multimodal55.094.0 ▲
Long-context75.0 ▲40.0
Output speed62 t/s220 t/s ▲
Output price$10/M$0.03/M ▲
Context window262K ▲32K
Scores aggregated from five independent leaderboards. See Methodology. More head-to-heads: Simba 3.2 vs Claude Mythos · Simba 3.2 vs Claude 5.5 Sonnet · Simba 3.2 vs Kimi K3.1 Pro · Simba 3.2 vs Eleven Multilingual v3
0 / 4