Claude 5.5 SonnetvsSimba 3.2

Claude 5.5 Sonnet leads the overall Podium Score by 7.0 points (94.8 vs 87.8).Category wins: Claude 5.5 Sonnet 7 — 0 Simba 3.2.Simba 3.2 is the cheaper pick ($10/M vs $15/M per 1M output tokens). Claude 5.5 Sonnet is faster (94 t/s vs 62 t/s).

Open in Compare Tool →View Claude 5.5 SonnetView Simba 3.2
Claude 5.5 SonnetDrag slider or hover to compareSimba 3.2
Simba 3.2
87.8
Coding: 62.0 · Speed: 62 t/s
Output Price: $10/M
Claude 5.5 Sonnet
94.8
Coding: 91.5 · Speed: 94 t/s
Output Price: $15/M
Quick VerdictAggregated 2026 Benchmark Analysis

Claude 5.5 Sonnet is rated higher overall with a Podium Score of 94.8 (vs 87.8 for Simba 3.2). In head-to-head domain evaluations, Claude 5.5 Sonnet outperforms in 7 of 7 benchmark categories.

Coding & Engineering
Claude 5.5 Sonnet (91.5)
Inference Speed
Claude 5.5 Sonnet (94 t/s)
Cost Efficiency
Simba 3.2 ($10/M)
API Price / 1M (in · out)
Claude 5.5 Sonnet $3/M · $15/M — Simba 3.2 $2/M · $10/M

Choose Claude 5.5 Sonnet for long documents and large codebases, and Simba 3.2 for cost-sensitive workloads.

MetricClaude 5.5 SonnetSimba 3.2
Podium Score94.8 ▲87.8
Arena Elo1520 ▲1400
Intelligence Index95.0 ▲62.0
Coding91.5 ▲62.0
Math94.2 ▲84.0
Reasoning95.0 ▲88.0
Agentic89.4 ▲70.0
Knowledge88.0 ▲50.0
Multimodal96.0 ▲55.0
Long-context98.0 ▲75.0
Output speed94 t/s ▲62 t/s
Output price$15/M$10/M ▲
Context window1000K ▲262K
Scores aggregated from five independent leaderboards. See Methodology. More head-to-heads: Claude 5.5 Sonnet vs Claude Mythos · Claude 5.5 Sonnet vs Kimi K3.1 Pro · Claude 5.5 Sonnet vs Eleven Multilingual v3 · Claude 5.5 Sonnet vs FLUX.2 Pro
0 / 4
Compare Now →