Simba 3.2vsDeepgram Flux
Simba 3.2 leads the overall Podium Score by 1.3 points (87.8 vs 86.5).Category wins: Simba 3.2 5 — 2 Deepgram Flux.Deepgram Flux is the cheaper pick ($0.015/M vs $10/M per 1M output tokens). Deepgram Flux is faster (260 t/s vs 62 t/s).
Simba 3.2Drag slider or hover to compareDeepgram Flux
Quick VerdictAggregated 2026 Benchmark Analysis
Simba 3.2 is rated higher overall with a Podium Score of 87.8 (vs 86.5 for Deepgram Flux). In head-to-head domain evaluations, Simba 3.2 outperforms in 5 of 7 benchmark categories.
Coding & Engineering
Simba 3.2 (62.0)
Inference Speed
Deepgram Flux (260 t/s)
Cost Efficiency
Deepgram Flux ($0.015/M)
API Price / 1M (in · out)
Simba 3.2 $2/M · $10/M — Deepgram Flux $0.007/M · $0.015/M
Choose Simba 3.2 for complex reasoning and analysis, and Deepgram Flux for vision and multimodal apps.
| Metric | Simba 3.2 | Deepgram Flux |
|---|---|---|
| Podium Score | 87.8 ▲ | 86.5 |
| Arena Elo | 1400 ▲ | 1380 |
| Intelligence Index | 62.0 | 86.0 ▲ |
| Coding | 62.0 ▲ | 0.0 |
| Math | 84.0 ▲ | 0.0 |
| Reasoning | 88.0 ▲ | 25.0 |
| Agentic | 70.0 | 72.0 ▲ |
| Knowledge | 50.0 ▲ | 45.0 |
| Multimodal | 55.0 | 92.5 ▲ |
| Long-context | 75.0 ▲ | 45.0 |
| Output speed | 62 t/s | 260 t/s ▲ |
| Output price | $10/M | $0.015/M ▲ |
| Context window | 262K ▲ | 64K |
Scores aggregated from five independent leaderboards. See Methodology. More head-to-heads: Simba 3.2 vs Claude Mythos · Simba 3.2 vs Claude 5.5 Sonnet · Simba 3.2 vs Kimi K3.1 Pro · Simba 3.2 vs Eleven Multilingual v3