Qwen Audio 3.1 TTS+vsWan 2.2 A14B

Qwen Audio 3.1 TTS+ leads the overall Podium Score by 2.0 points (89.4 vs 87.4).Category wins: Qwen Audio 3.1 TTS+ 1 — 3 Wan 2.2 A14B.Qwen Audio 3.1 TTS+ is the cheaper pick ($0.02/M vs $0.06/M per 1M output tokens). Qwen Audio 3.1 TTS+ is faster (140 t/s vs 15 t/s).

Open in Compare Tool →View Qwen Audio 3.1 TTS+View Wan 2.2 A14B
Qwen Audio 3.1 TTS+Drag slider or hover to compareWan 2.2 A14B
Wan 2.2 A14B
87.4
Coding: 0.0 · Speed: 15 t/s
Output Price: $0.06/M
Qwen Audio 3.1 TTS+
89.4
Coding: 0.0 · Speed: 140 t/s
Output Price: $0.02/M
Quick VerdictAggregated 2026 Benchmark Analysis

Qwen Audio 3.1 TTS+ is rated higher overall with a Podium Score of 89.4 (vs 87.4 for Wan 2.2 A14B). In head-to-head domain evaluations, Wan 2.2 A14B outperforms in 3 of 7 benchmark categories.

Coding & Engineering
Qwen Audio 3.1 TTS+ (0.0)
Inference Speed
Qwen Audio 3.1 TTS+ (140 t/s)
Cost Efficiency
Qwen Audio 3.1 TTS+ ($0.02/M)
API Price / 1M (in · out)
Qwen Audio 3.1 TTS+ $0.01/M · $0.02/M — Wan 2.2 A14B $0.06/M · $0.06/M

Choose Qwen Audio 3.1 TTS+ for autonomous agents and tool use, and Wan 2.2 A14B for vision and multimodal apps.

MetricQwen Audio 3.1 TTS+Wan 2.2 A14B
Podium Score89.4 ▲87.4
Arena Elo1430 ▲1415
Intelligence Index89.0 ▲87.0
Coding0.00.0
Math0.00.0
Reasoning30.035.0 ▲
Agentic50.0 ▲20.0
Knowledge45.055.0 ▲
Multimodal86.096.0 ▲
Long-context45.045.0
Output speed140 t/s ▲15 t/s
Output price$0.02/M ▲$0.06/M
Context window32K64K ▲
Scores aggregated from five independent leaderboards. See Methodology. More head-to-heads: Qwen Audio 3.1 TTS+ vs Claude Mythos · Qwen Audio 3.1 TTS+ vs Claude 5.5 Sonnet · Qwen Audio 3.1 TTS+ vs Kimi K3.1 Pro · Qwen Audio 3.1 TTS+ vs Eleven Multilingual v3
0 / 4
Compare Now →