Claude 5.5 SonnetvsQwen Audio 3.1 TTS+

Claude 5.5 Sonnet leads the overall Podium Score by 5.4 points (94.8 vs 89.4).Category wins: Claude 5.5 Sonnet 7 — 0 Qwen Audio 3.1 TTS+.Qwen Audio 3.1 TTS+ is the cheaper pick ($0.02/M vs $15/M per 1M output tokens). Qwen Audio 3.1 TTS+ is faster (140 t/s vs 94 t/s).

Open in Compare Tool →View Claude 5.5 SonnetView Qwen Audio 3.1 TTS+
Claude 5.5 SonnetDrag slider or hover to compareQwen Audio 3.1 TTS+
Qwen Audio 3.1 TTS+
89.4
Coding: 0.0 · Speed: 140 t/s
Output Price: $0.02/M
Claude 5.5 Sonnet
94.8
Coding: 91.5 · Speed: 94 t/s
Output Price: $15/M
Quick VerdictAggregated 2026 Benchmark Analysis

Claude 5.5 Sonnet is rated higher overall with a Podium Score of 94.8 (vs 89.4 for Qwen Audio 3.1 TTS+). In head-to-head domain evaluations, Claude 5.5 Sonnet outperforms in 7 of 7 benchmark categories.

Coding & Engineering
Claude 5.5 Sonnet (91.5)
Inference Speed
Qwen Audio 3.1 TTS+ (140 t/s)
Cost Efficiency
Qwen Audio 3.1 TTS+ ($0.02/M)
API Price / 1M (in · out)
Claude 5.5 Sonnet $3/M · $15/M — Qwen Audio 3.1 TTS+ $0.01/M · $0.02/M

Choose Claude 5.5 Sonnet for long documents and large codebases, and Qwen Audio 3.1 TTS+ for cost-sensitive workloads.

MetricClaude 5.5 SonnetQwen Audio 3.1 TTS+
Podium Score94.8 ▲89.4
Arena Elo1520 ▲1430
Intelligence Index95.0 ▲89.0
Coding91.5 ▲0.0
Math94.2 ▲0.0
Reasoning95.0 ▲30.0
Agentic89.4 ▲50.0
Knowledge88.0 ▲45.0
Multimodal96.0 ▲86.0
Long-context98.0 ▲45.0
Output speed94 t/s140 t/s ▲
Output price$15/M$0.02/M ▲
Context window1000K ▲32K
Scores aggregated from five independent leaderboards. See Methodology. More head-to-heads: Claude 5.5 Sonnet vs Claude Mythos · Claude 5.5 Sonnet vs Kimi K3.1 Pro · Claude 5.5 Sonnet vs Eleven Multilingual v3 · Claude 5.5 Sonnet vs FLUX.2 Pro
0 / 4
Compare Now →