MiMo v2.6 FlashvsNVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Super-VL

MiMo v2.6 Flash leads the overall Podium Score by 0.6 points (88.4 vs 87.8).Category wins: MiMo v2.6 Flash 5 — 2 NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Super-VL.MiMo v2.6 Flash is the cheaper pick ($0.3/M vs $1.2/M per 1M output tokens). MiMo v2.6 Flash is faster (118 t/s vs 110 t/s).

MiMo v2.6 FlashDrag slider or hover to compareNVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Super-VL
NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Super-VL
87.8
Coding: 83.0 · Speed: 110 t/s
Output Price: $1.2/M
MiMo v2.6 Flash
88.4
Coding: 86.0 · Speed: 118 t/s
Output Price: $0.3/M
Quick VerdictAggregated 2026 Benchmark Analysis

MiMo v2.6 Flash is rated higher overall with a Podium Score of 88.4 (vs 87.8 for NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Super-VL). In head-to-head domain evaluations, MiMo v2.6 Flash outperforms in 5 of 7 benchmark categories.

Coding & Engineering
MiMo v2.6 Flash (86.0)
Inference Speed
MiMo v2.6 Flash (118 t/s)
Cost Efficiency
MiMo v2.6 Flash ($0.3/M)
API Price / 1M (in · out)
MiMo v2.6 Flash $0.1/M · $0.3/M — NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Super-VL $0.35/M · $1.2/M

Choose MiMo v2.6 Flash for long documents and large codebases, and NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Super-VL for vision and multimodal apps.

MetricMiMo v2.6 FlashNVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Super-VL
Podium Score88.4 ▲87.8
Arena Elo1425 ▲1418
Intelligence Index88.088.0
Coding86.0 ▲83.0
Math85.0 ▲84.0
Reasoning87.0 ▲86.0
Agentic84.0 ▲81.0
Knowledge84.085.0 ▲
Multimodal87.096.0 ▲
Long-context95.0 ▲91.0
Output speed118 t/s ▲110 t/s
Output price$0.3/M ▲$1.2/M
Context window1000K ▲512K
0 / 4