Claude 5.5 SonnetvsMiMo v2.6 Flash

Claude 5.5 Sonnet leads the overall Podium Score by 6.4 points (94.8 vs 88.4).Category wins: Claude 5.5 Sonnet 7 — 0 MiMo v2.6 Flash.MiMo v2.6 Flash is the cheaper pick ($0.3/M vs $15/M per 1M output tokens). MiMo v2.6 Flash is faster (118 t/s vs 94 t/s).

Claude 5.5 SonnetDrag slider or hover to compareMiMo v2.6 Flash
MiMo v2.6 Flash
88.4
Coding: 86.0 · Speed: 118 t/s
Output Price: $0.3/M
Claude 5.5 Sonnet
94.8
Coding: 91.5 · Speed: 94 t/s
Output Price: $15/M
Quick VerdictAggregated 2026 Benchmark Analysis

Claude 5.5 Sonnet is rated higher overall with a Podium Score of 94.8 (vs 88.4 for MiMo v2.6 Flash). In head-to-head domain evaluations, Claude 5.5 Sonnet outperforms in 7 of 7 benchmark categories.

Coding & Engineering
Claude 5.5 Sonnet (91.5)
Inference Speed
MiMo v2.6 Flash (118 t/s)
Cost Efficiency
MiMo v2.6 Flash ($0.3/M)
API Price / 1M (in · out)
Claude 5.5 Sonnet $3/M · $15/M — MiMo v2.6 Flash $0.1/M · $0.3/M

Choose Claude 5.5 Sonnet for long documents and large codebases, and MiMo v2.6 Flash for cost-sensitive workloads.

MetricClaude 5.5 SonnetMiMo v2.6 Flash
Podium Score94.8 ▲88.4
Arena Elo1520 ▲1425
Intelligence Index95.0 ▲88.0
Coding91.5 ▲86.0
Math94.2 ▲85.0
Reasoning95.0 ▲87.0
Agentic89.4 ▲84.0
Knowledge88.0 ▲84.0
Multimodal96.0 ▲87.0
Long-context98.0 ▲95.0
Output speed94 t/s118 t/s ▲
Output price$15/M$0.3/M ▲
Context window1000K1000K
0 / 4