Kling 3.0 ProvsWan 2.2 A14B

Kling 3.0 Pro leads the overall Podium Score by 1.2 points (88.6 vs 87.4).Category wins: Kling 3.0 Pro 5 — 0 Wan 2.2 A14B.Wan 2.2 A14B is the cheaper pick ($0.06/M vs $0.1/M per 1M output tokens). Kling 3.0 Pro is faster (25 t/s vs 15 t/s).

Open in Compare Tool →View Kling 3.0 ProView Wan 2.2 A14B
Kling 3.0 ProDrag slider or hover to compareWan 2.2 A14B
Wan 2.2 A14B
87.4
Coding: 0.0 · Speed: 15 t/s
Output Price: $0.06/M
Kling 3.0 Pro
88.6
Coding: 0.0 · Speed: 25 t/s
Output Price: $0.1/M
Quick VerdictAggregated 2026 Benchmark Analysis

Kling 3.0 Pro is rated higher overall with a Podium Score of 88.6 (vs 87.4 for Wan 2.2 A14B). In head-to-head domain evaluations, Kling 3.0 Pro outperforms in 5 of 7 benchmark categories.

Coding & Engineering
Kling 3.0 Pro (0.0)
Inference Speed
Kling 3.0 Pro (25 t/s)
Cost Efficiency
Wan 2.2 A14B ($0.06/M)
API Price / 1M (in · out)
Kling 3.0 Pro $0.1/M · $0.1/M — Wan 2.2 A14B $0.06/M · $0.06/M

Choose Kling 3.0 Pro for vision and multimodal apps, and Wan 2.2 A14B for cost-sensitive workloads.

MetricKling 3.0 ProWan 2.2 A14B
Podium Score88.6 ▲87.4
Arena Elo1420 ▲1415
Intelligence Index88.0 ▲87.0
Coding0.00.0
Math0.00.0
Reasoning40.0 ▲35.0
Agentic25.0 ▲20.0
Knowledge60.0 ▲55.0
Multimodal98.8 ▲96.0
Long-context50.0 ▲45.0
Output speed25 t/s ▲15 t/s
Output price$0.1/M$0.06/M ▲
Context window64K64K
Scores aggregated from five independent leaderboards. See Methodology. More head-to-heads: Kling 3.0 Pro vs Claude Mythos · Kling 3.0 Pro vs Claude 5.5 Sonnet · Kling 3.0 Pro vs Kimi K3.1 Pro · Kling 3.0 Pro vs Eleven Multilingual v3
0 / 4
Compare Now →