Claude 5.5 SonnetvsKling 3.0 Pro

Claude 5.5 Sonnet leads the overall Podium Score by 6.2 points (94.8 vs 88.6).Category wins: Claude 5.5 Sonnet 6 — 1 Kling 3.0 Pro.Kling 3.0 Pro is the cheaper pick ($0.1/M vs $15/M per 1M output tokens). Claude 5.5 Sonnet is faster (94 t/s vs 25 t/s).

Claude 5.5 SonnetDrag slider or hover to compareKling 3.0 Pro
Kling 3.0 Pro
88.6
Coding: 0.0 · Speed: 25 t/s
Output Price: $0.1/M
Claude 5.5 Sonnet
94.8
Coding: 91.5 · Speed: 94 t/s
Output Price: $15/M
Quick VerdictAggregated 2026 Benchmark Analysis

Claude 5.5 Sonnet is rated higher overall with a Podium Score of 94.8 (vs 88.6 for Kling 3.0 Pro). In head-to-head domain evaluations, Claude 5.5 Sonnet outperforms in 6 of 7 benchmark categories.

Coding & Engineering
Claude 5.5 Sonnet (91.5)
Inference Speed
Claude 5.5 Sonnet (94 t/s)
Cost Efficiency
Kling 3.0 Pro ($0.1/M)
API Price / 1M (in · out)
Claude 5.5 Sonnet $3/M · $15/M — Kling 3.0 Pro $0.1/M · $0.1/M

Choose Claude 5.5 Sonnet for long documents and large codebases, and Kling 3.0 Pro for vision and multimodal apps.

MetricClaude 5.5 SonnetKling 3.0 Pro
Podium Score94.8 ▲88.6
Arena Elo1520 ▲1420
Intelligence Index95.0 ▲88.0
Coding91.5 ▲0.0
Math94.2 ▲0.0
Reasoning95.0 ▲40.0
Agentic89.4 ▲25.0
Knowledge88.0 ▲60.0
Multimodal96.098.8 ▲
Long-context98.0 ▲50.0
Output speed94 t/s ▲25 t/s
Output price$15/M$0.1/M ▲
Context window1000K ▲64K
0 / 4