Claude Fable 5.1 (XHigh)vsKling 3.0 Pro
Claude Fable 5.1 (XHigh) leads the overall Podium Score by 0.4 points (89.0 vs 88.6).Category wins: Claude Fable 5.1 (XHigh) 2 — 2 Kling 3.0 Pro.Kling 3.0 Pro is the cheaper pick ($0.1/M vs $15/M per 1M output tokens). Claude Fable 5.1 (XHigh) is faster (78 t/s vs 25 t/s).
Claude Fable 5.1 (XHigh)Drag slider or hover to compareKling 3.0 Pro
Quick VerdictAggregated 2026 Benchmark Analysis
Claude Fable 5.1 (XHigh) is rated higher overall with a Podium Score of 89.0 (vs 88.6 for Kling 3.0 Pro). Both models show closely matched capabilities across domain benchmarks.
Coding & Engineering
Claude Fable 5.1 (XHigh) (88.0)
Inference Speed
Claude Fable 5.1 (XHigh) (78 t/s)
Cost Efficiency
Kling 3.0 Pro ($0.1/M)
API Price / 1M (in · out)
Claude Fable 5.1 (XHigh) $3/M · $15/M — Kling 3.0 Pro $0.1/M · $0.1/M
Choose Claude Fable 5.1 (XHigh) for coding and software engineering, and Kling 3.0 Pro for vision and multimodal apps.
| Metric | Claude Fable 5.1 (XHigh) | Kling 3.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Podium Score | 89.0 ▲ | 88.6 |
| Arena Elo | — | 1420 |
| Intelligence Index | — | 88.0 |
| Coding | 88.0 ▲ | 0.0 |
| Math | — | 0.0 |
| Reasoning | 85.0 ▲ | 40.0 |
| Agentic | — | 25.0 |
| Knowledge | 45.0 | 60.0 ▲ |
| Multimodal | 30.0 | 98.8 ▲ |
| Long-context | — | 50.0 |
| Output speed | 78 t/s ▲ | 25 t/s |
| Output price | $15/M | $0.1/M ▲ |
| Context window | 500K ▲ | 64K |
Scores aggregated from five independent leaderboards. See Methodology. More head-to-heads: Claude Fable 5.1 (XHigh) vs Claude Mythos · Claude Fable 5.1 (XHigh) vs Claude 5.5 Sonnet · Claude Fable 5.1 (XHigh) vs Kimi K3.1 Pro · Claude Fable 5.1 (XHigh) vs Eleven Multilingual v3