Eleven Multilingual v3vsClaude Fable 5.1 (XHigh)

Eleven Multilingual v3 leads the overall Podium Score by 5.0 points (94.0 vs 89.0).Category wins: Eleven Multilingual v3 2 — 2 Claude Fable 5.1 (XHigh).Eleven Multilingual v3 is the cheaper pick ($0.05/M vs $15/M per 1M output tokens). Eleven Multilingual v3 is faster (200 t/s vs 78 t/s).

Eleven Multilingual v3Drag slider or hover to compareClaude Fable 5.1 (XHigh)
Claude Fable 5.1 (XHigh)
89.0
Coding: 88.0 · Speed: 78 t/s
Output Price: $15/M
Eleven Multilingual v3
94.0
Coding: 0.0 · Speed: 200 t/s
Output Price: $0.05/M
Quick VerdictAggregated 2026 Benchmark Analysis

Eleven Multilingual v3 is rated higher overall with a Podium Score of 94.0 (vs 89.0 for Claude Fable 5.1 (XHigh)). Both models show closely matched capabilities across domain benchmarks.

Coding & Engineering
Claude Fable 5.1 (XHigh) (88.0)
Inference Speed
Eleven Multilingual v3 (200 t/s)
Cost Efficiency
Eleven Multilingual v3 ($0.05/M)
API Price / 1M (in · out)
Eleven Multilingual v3 $0.025/M · $0.05/M — Claude Fable 5.1 (XHigh) $3/M · $15/M

Choose Eleven Multilingual v3 for vision and multimodal apps, and Claude Fable 5.1 (XHigh) for coding and software engineering.

MetricEleven Multilingual v3Claude Fable 5.1 (XHigh)
Podium Score94.0 ▲89.0
Arena Elo1485—
Intelligence Index94.0—
Coding0.088.0 ▲
Math0.0—
Reasoning35.085.0 ▲
Agentic65.0—
Knowledge48.0 ▲45.0
Multimodal95.0 ▲30.0
Long-context45.0—
Output speed200 t/s ▲78 t/s
Output price$0.05/M ▲$15/M
Context window32K500K ▲
0 / 4