Step Audio 2vsLing 3.1 Flash

Step Audio 2 leads the overall Podium Score by 0.5 points (89.0 vs 88.5).Category wins: Step Audio 2 2 — 5 Ling 3.1 Flash.Step Audio 2 is the cheaper pick ($0.024/M vs $0.8/M per 1M output tokens). Ling 3.1 Flash is faster (175 t/s vs 150 t/s).

Step Audio 2Drag slider or hover to compareLing 3.1 Flash
Ling 3.1 Flash
88.5
Coding: 50.0 · Speed: 175 t/s
Output Price: $0.8/M
Step Audio 2
89.0
Coding: 0.0 · Speed: 150 t/s
Output Price: $0.024/M
Quick VerdictAggregated 2026 Benchmark Analysis

Step Audio 2 is rated higher overall with a Podium Score of 89.0 (vs 88.5 for Ling 3.1 Flash). In head-to-head domain evaluations, Ling 3.1 Flash outperforms in 5 of 7 benchmark categories.

Coding & Engineering
Ling 3.1 Flash (50.0)
Inference Speed
Ling 3.1 Flash (175 t/s)
Cost Efficiency
Step Audio 2 ($0.024/M)
API Price / 1M (in · out)
Step Audio 2 $0.012/M · $0.024/M — Ling 3.1 Flash $0.15/M · $0.8/M

Choose Step Audio 2 for vision and multimodal apps, and Ling 3.1 Flash for complex reasoning and analysis.

MetricStep Audio 2Ling 3.1 Flash
Podium Score89.0 ▲88.5
Arena Elo1422 ▲1418
Intelligence Index89.0 ▲56.0
Coding0.050.0 ▲
Math0.078.0 ▲
Reasoning32.085.0 ▲
Agentic55.058.0 ▲
Knowledge46.0 ▲42.0
Multimodal85.0 ▲40.0
Long-context45.068.0 ▲
Output speed150 t/s175 t/s ▲
Output price$0.024/M ▲$0.8/M
Context window64K131K ▲
0 / 4