Qwen3 TTS FlashvsWan 2.2 A14B

Qwen3 TTS Flash leads the overall Podium Score by 0.7 points (88.1 vs 87.4).Category wins: Qwen3 TTS Flash 1 — 4 Wan 2.2 A14B.Qwen3 TTS Flash is the cheaper pick ($0.01/M vs $0.06/M per 1M output tokens). Qwen3 TTS Flash is faster (230 t/s vs 15 t/s).

Qwen3 TTS FlashDrag slider or hover to compareWan 2.2 A14B
Wan 2.2 A14B
87.4
Coding: 0.0 · Speed: 15 t/s
Output Price: $0.06/M
Qwen3 TTS Flash
88.1
Coding: 0.0 · Speed: 230 t/s
Output Price: $0.01/M
Quick VerdictAggregated 2026 Benchmark Analysis

Qwen3 TTS Flash is rated higher overall with a Podium Score of 88.1 (vs 87.4 for Wan 2.2 A14B). In head-to-head domain evaluations, Wan 2.2 A14B outperforms in 4 of 7 benchmark categories.

Coding & Engineering
Qwen3 TTS Flash (0.0)
Inference Speed
Qwen3 TTS Flash (230 t/s)
Cost Efficiency
Qwen3 TTS Flash ($0.01/M)
API Price / 1M (in · out)
Qwen3 TTS Flash $0.005/M · $0.01/M — Wan 2.2 A14B $0.06/M · $0.06/M

Choose Qwen3 TTS Flash for autonomous agents and tool use, and Wan 2.2 A14B for vision and multimodal apps.

MetricQwen3 TTS FlashWan 2.2 A14B
Podium Score88.1 ▲87.4
Arena Elo14081415 ▲
Intelligence Index88.0 ▲87.0
Coding0.00.0
Math0.00.0
Reasoning25.035.0 ▲
Agentic45.0 ▲20.0
Knowledge42.055.0 ▲
Multimodal82.096.0 ▲
Long-context40.045.0 ▲
Output speed230 t/s ▲15 t/s
Output price$0.01/M ▲$0.06/M
Context window32K64K ▲
0 / 4