Qwen3 TTS FlashvsNVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Super-VL

Qwen3 TTS Flash leads the overall Podium Score by 0.3 points (88.1 vs 87.8).Category wins: Qwen3 TTS Flash 0 — 7 NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Super-VL.Qwen3 TTS Flash is the cheaper pick ($0.01/M vs $1.2/M per 1M output tokens). Qwen3 TTS Flash is faster (230 t/s vs 110 t/s).

Qwen3 TTS FlashDrag slider or hover to compareNVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Super-VL
NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Super-VL
87.8
Coding: 83.0 · Speed: 110 t/s
Output Price: $1.2/M
Qwen3 TTS Flash
88.1
Coding: 0.0 · Speed: 230 t/s
Output Price: $0.01/M
Quick VerdictAggregated 2026 Benchmark Analysis

Qwen3 TTS Flash is rated higher overall with a Podium Score of 88.1 (vs 87.8 for NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Super-VL). In head-to-head domain evaluations, NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Super-VL outperforms in 7 of 7 benchmark categories.

Coding & Engineering
NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Super-VL (83.0)
Inference Speed
Qwen3 TTS Flash (230 t/s)
Cost Efficiency
Qwen3 TTS Flash ($0.01/M)
API Price / 1M (in · out)
Qwen3 TTS Flash $0.005/M · $0.01/M — NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Super-VL $0.35/M · $1.2/M

Choose Qwen3 TTS Flash for cost-sensitive workloads, and NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Super-VL for vision and multimodal apps.

MetricQwen3 TTS FlashNVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Super-VL
Podium Score88.1 ▲87.8
Arena Elo14081418 ▲
Intelligence Index88.088.0
Coding0.083.0 ▲
Math0.084.0 ▲
Reasoning25.086.0 ▲
Agentic45.081.0 ▲
Knowledge42.085.0 ▲
Multimodal82.096.0 ▲
Long-context40.091.0 ▲
Output speed230 t/s ▲110 t/s
Output price$0.01/M ▲$1.2/M
Context window32K512K ▲
0 / 4