Qwen3 TTS FlashvsNVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Super-VL
Qwen3 TTS Flash leads the overall Podium Score by 0.3 points (88.1 vs 87.8).Category wins: Qwen3 TTS Flash 0 — 7 NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Super-VL.Qwen3 TTS Flash is the cheaper pick ($0.01/M vs $1.2/M per 1M output tokens). Qwen3 TTS Flash is faster (230 t/s vs 110 t/s).
Qwen3 TTS FlashDrag slider or hover to compareNVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Super-VL
Quick VerdictAggregated 2026 Benchmark Analysis
Qwen3 TTS Flash is rated higher overall with a Podium Score of 88.1 (vs 87.8 for NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Super-VL). In head-to-head domain evaluations, NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Super-VL outperforms in 7 of 7 benchmark categories.
Coding & Engineering
NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Super-VL (83.0)
Inference Speed
Qwen3 TTS Flash (230 t/s)
Cost Efficiency
Qwen3 TTS Flash ($0.01/M)
API Price / 1M (in · out)
Qwen3 TTS Flash $0.005/M · $0.01/M — NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Super-VL $0.35/M · $1.2/M
Choose Qwen3 TTS Flash for cost-sensitive workloads, and NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Super-VL for vision and multimodal apps.
| Metric | Qwen3 TTS Flash | NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Super-VL |
|---|---|---|
| Podium Score | 88.1 ▲ | 87.8 |
| Arena Elo | 1408 | 1418 ▲ |
| Intelligence Index | 88.0 | 88.0 |
| Coding | 0.0 | 83.0 ▲ |
| Math | 0.0 | 84.0 ▲ |
| Reasoning | 25.0 | 86.0 ▲ |
| Agentic | 45.0 | 81.0 ▲ |
| Knowledge | 42.0 | 85.0 ▲ |
| Multimodal | 82.0 | 96.0 ▲ |
| Long-context | 40.0 | 91.0 ▲ |
| Output speed | 230 t/s ▲ | 110 t/s |
| Output price | $0.01/M ▲ | $1.2/M |
| Context window | 32K | 512K ▲ |
Scores aggregated from five independent leaderboards. See Methodology. More head-to-heads: Qwen3 TTS Flash vs Claude Mythos · Qwen3 TTS Flash vs Claude 5.5 Sonnet · Qwen3 TTS Flash vs Kimi K3.1 Pro · Qwen3 TTS Flash vs Eleven Multilingual v3