NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Super-VLvsSimba 3.2

NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Super-VL is tied with Simba 3.2 on the Podium Score (87.8).Category wins: NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Super-VL 5 — 1 Simba 3.2.NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Super-VL is the cheaper pick ($1.2/M vs $10/M per 1M output tokens). NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Super-VL is faster (110 t/s vs 62 t/s).

Open in Compare Tool →View NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Super-VLView Simba 3.2
NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Super-VLDrag slider or hover to compareSimba 3.2
Simba 3.2
87.8
Coding: 62.0 · Speed: 62 t/s
Output Price: $10/M
NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Super-VL
87.8
Coding: 83.0 · Speed: 110 t/s
Output Price: $1.2/M
Quick VerdictAggregated 2026 Benchmark Analysis

NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Super-VL is rated higher overall with a Podium Score of 87.8 (vs 87.8 for Simba 3.2). In head-to-head domain evaluations, NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Super-VL outperforms in 5 of 7 benchmark categories.

Coding & Engineering
NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Super-VL (83.0)
Inference Speed
NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Super-VL (110 t/s)
Cost Efficiency
NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Super-VL ($1.2/M)
API Price / 1M (in · out)
NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Super-VL $0.35/M · $1.2/M — Simba 3.2 $2/M · $10/M

Choose NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Super-VL for vision and multimodal apps, and Simba 3.2 for complex reasoning and analysis.

MetricNVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Super-VLSimba 3.2
Podium Score87.887.8
Arena Elo1418 ▲1400
Intelligence Index88.0 ▲62.0
Coding83.0 ▲62.0
Math84.084.0
Reasoning86.088.0 ▲
Agentic81.0 ▲70.0
Knowledge85.0 ▲50.0
Multimodal96.0 ▲55.0
Long-context91.0 ▲75.0
Output speed110 t/s ▲62 t/s
Output price$1.2/M ▲$10/M
Context window512K ▲262K
Scores aggregated from five independent leaderboards. See Methodology. More head-to-heads: NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Super-VL vs Claude Mythos · NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Super-VL vs Claude 5.5 Sonnet · NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Super-VL vs Kimi K3.1 Pro · NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Super-VL vs Eleven Multilingual v3
0 / 4
Compare Now →