NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Super-VLvsNvidia Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49b V1.5

NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Super-VL leads the overall Podium Score by 20.8 points (87.8 vs 67.0).Category wins: NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Super-VL 0 — 0 Nvidia Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49b V1.5.NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Super-VL is the cheaper pick ($1.2/M vs $3/M per 1M output tokens). NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Super-VL is faster (110 t/s vs 50 t/s).

NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Super-VLDrag slider or hover to compareNvidia Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49b V1.5
Nvidia Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49b V1.5
67.0
Coding: — · Speed: 50 t/s
Output Price: $3/M
NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Super-VL
87.8
Coding: 83.0 · Speed: 110 t/s
Output Price: $1.2/M
Quick VerdictAggregated 2026 Benchmark Analysis

NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Super-VL is rated higher overall with a Podium Score of 87.8 (vs 67.0 for Nvidia Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49b V1.5). Both models show closely matched capabilities across domain benchmarks.

Coding & Engineering
Comparable
Inference Speed
NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Super-VL (110 t/s)
Cost Efficiency
NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Super-VL ($1.2/M)
API Price / 1M (in · out)
NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Super-VL $0.35/M · $1.2/M — Nvidia Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49b V1.5 $1/M · $3/M

Choose NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Super-VL for cost-sensitive workloads, and Nvidia Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49b V1.5 for general-purpose workloads.

MetricNVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Super-VLNvidia Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49b V1.5
Podium Score87.8 ▲67.0
Arena Elo1418—
Intelligence Index88.0—
Coding83.0—
Math84.0—
Reasoning86.0—
Agentic81.0—
Knowledge85.0—
Multimodal96.0—
Long-context91.0—
Output speed110 t/s ▲50 t/s
Output price$1.2/M ▲$3/M
Context window512K ▲128K
0 / 4