NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Super-VLvsClaude Opus 5

NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Super-VL leads the overall Podium Score by 6.4 points (87.8 vs 81.4).Category wins: NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Super-VL 3 — 1 Claude Opus 5.NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Super-VL is the cheaper pick ($1.2/M vs $25/M per 1M output tokens). NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Super-VL is faster (110 t/s vs 60 t/s).

NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Super-VLDrag slider or hover to compareClaude Opus 5
Claude Opus 5
81.4
Coding: 70.4 · Speed: 60 t/s
Output Price: $25/M
NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Super-VL
87.8
Coding: 83.0 · Speed: 110 t/s
Output Price: $1.2/M
Quick VerdictAggregated 2026 Benchmark Analysis

NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Super-VL is rated higher overall with a Podium Score of 87.8 (vs 81.4 for Claude Opus 5). In head-to-head domain evaluations, NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Super-VL outperforms in 3 of 7 benchmark categories.

Coding & Engineering
NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Super-VL (83.0)
Inference Speed
NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Super-VL (110 t/s)
Cost Efficiency
NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Super-VL ($1.2/M)
API Price / 1M (in · out)
NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Super-VL $0.35/M · $1.2/M — Claude Opus 5 $5/M · $25/M

Choose NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Super-VL for complex reasoning and analysis, and Claude Opus 5 for long documents and large codebases.

MetricNVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Super-VLClaude Opus 5
Podium Score87.8 ▲81.4
Arena Elo14181492 ▲
Intelligence Index88.0 ▲61.0
Coding83.0 ▲70.4
Math84.0—
Reasoning86.0 ▲82.3
Agentic81.0—
Knowledge85.0 ▲37.1
Multimodal96.0—
Long-context91.099.2 ▲
Output speed110 t/s ▲60 t/s
Output price$1.2/M ▲$25/M
Context window512K1000K ▲
0 / 4