Kimi K3.1 HighspeedvsLing 3.1 Flash

Kimi K3.1 Highspeed leads the overall Podium Score by 3.0 points (91.5 vs 88.5).Category wins: Kimi K3.1 Highspeed 6 — 1 Ling 3.1 Flash.Ling 3.1 Flash is the cheaper pick ($0.8/M vs $8/M per 1M output tokens). Ling 3.1 Flash is faster (175 t/s vs 130 t/s).

Kimi K3.1 HighspeedDrag slider or hover to compareLing 3.1 Flash
Ling 3.1 Flash
88.5
Coding: 50.0 · Speed: 175 t/s
Output Price: $0.8/M
Kimi K3.1 Highspeed
91.5
Coding: 60.0 · Speed: 130 t/s
Output Price: $8/M
Quick VerdictAggregated 2026 Benchmark Analysis

Kimi K3.1 Highspeed is rated higher overall with a Podium Score of 91.5 (vs 88.5 for Ling 3.1 Flash). In head-to-head domain evaluations, Kimi K3.1 Highspeed outperforms in 6 of 7 benchmark categories.

Coding & Engineering
Kimi K3.1 Highspeed (60.0)
Inference Speed
Ling 3.1 Flash (175 t/s)
Cost Efficiency
Ling 3.1 Flash ($0.8/M)
API Price / 1M (in · out)
Kimi K3.1 Highspeed $1.5/M · $8/M — Ling 3.1 Flash $0.15/M · $0.8/M

Choose Kimi K3.1 Highspeed for long documents and large codebases, and Ling 3.1 Flash for knowledge and factual QA.

MetricKimi K3.1 HighspeedLing 3.1 Flash
Podium Score91.5 ▲88.5
Arena Elo1455 ▲1418
Intelligence Index60.0 ▲56.0
Coding60.0 ▲50.0
Math88.0 ▲78.0
Reasoning92.0 ▲85.0
Agentic74.0 ▲58.0
Knowledge38.042.0 ▲
Multimodal90.0 ▲40.0
Long-context98.0 ▲68.0
Output speed130 t/s175 t/s ▲
Output price$8/M$0.8/M ▲
Context window1000K ▲131K
0 / 4