GLM-4.5 AirvsLing 3.1 Flash
GLM-4.5 Air leads the overall Podium Score by 0.4 points (88.9 vs 88.5).Category wins: GLM-4.5 Air 6 — 1 Ling 3.1 Flash.Ling 3.1 Flash is the cheaper pick ($0.8/M vs $1.1/M per 1M output tokens). Ling 3.1 Flash is faster (175 t/s vs 96 t/s).
GLM-4.5 AirDrag slider or hover to compareLing 3.1 Flash
Quick VerdictAggregated 2026 Benchmark Analysis
GLM-4.5 Air is rated higher overall with a Podium Score of 88.9 (vs 88.5 for Ling 3.1 Flash). In head-to-head domain evaluations, GLM-4.5 Air outperforms in 6 of 7 benchmark categories.
Coding & Engineering
GLM-4.5 Air (55.0)
Inference Speed
Ling 3.1 Flash (175 t/s)
Cost Efficiency
Ling 3.1 Flash ($0.8/M)
API Price / 1M (in · out)
GLM-4.5 Air $0.2/M · $1.1/M — Ling 3.1 Flash $0.15/M · $0.8/M
Choose GLM-4.5 Air for complex reasoning and analysis, and Ling 3.1 Flash for knowledge and factual QA.
| Metric | GLM-4.5 Air | Ling 3.1 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Podium Score | 88.9 ▲ | 88.5 |
| Arena Elo | 1420 ▲ | 1418 |
| Intelligence Index | 58.0 ▲ | 56.0 |
| Coding | 55.0 ▲ | 50.0 |
| Math | 82.0 ▲ | 78.0 |
| Reasoning | 90.0 ▲ | 85.0 |
| Agentic | 62.0 ▲ | 58.0 |
| Knowledge | 40.0 | 42.0 ▲ |
| Multimodal | 70.0 ▲ | 40.0 |
| Long-context | 72.0 ▲ | 68.0 |
| Output speed | 96 t/s | 175 t/s ▲ |
| Output price | $1.1/M | $0.8/M ▲ |
| Context window | 131K | 131K |
Scores aggregated from five independent leaderboards. See Methodology. More head-to-heads: GLM-4.5 Air vs Claude Mythos · GLM-4.5 Air vs Claude 5.5 Sonnet · GLM-4.5 Air vs Kimi K3.1 Pro · GLM-4.5 Air vs Eleven Multilingual v3