Gemini 4 ArgonvsGemini 3.1 Flash-Lite Preview

Gemini 4 Argon leads the overall Podium Score by 8.2 points (93.6 vs 85.4).Category wins: Gemini 4 Argon 7 — 0 Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite Preview.Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite Preview is the cheaper pick ($0.3/M vs $10/M per 1M output tokens). Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite Preview is faster (210 t/s vs 88 t/s).

Gemini 4 ArgonDrag slider or hover to compareGemini 3.1 Flash-Lite Preview
Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite Preview
85.4
Coding: 76.0 · Speed: 210 t/s
Output Price: $0.3/M
Gemini 4 Argon
93.6
Coding: 88.0 · Speed: 88 t/s
Output Price: $10/M
Quick VerdictAggregated 2026 Benchmark Analysis

Gemini 4 Argon is rated higher overall with a Podium Score of 93.6 (vs 85.4 for Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite Preview). In head-to-head domain evaluations, Gemini 4 Argon outperforms in 7 of 7 benchmark categories.

Coding & Engineering
Gemini 4 Argon (88.0)
Inference Speed
Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite Preview (210 t/s)
Cost Efficiency
Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite Preview ($0.3/M)
API Price / 1M (in · out)
Gemini 4 Argon $2.5/M · $10/M — Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite $0.075/M · $0.3/M

Choose Gemini 4 Argon for long documents and large codebases, and Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite Preview for cost-sensitive workloads.

MetricGemini 4 ArgonGemini 3.1 Flash-Lite Preview
Podium Score93.6 ▲85.4
Arena Elo1505 ▲1365
Intelligence Index94.0 ▲85.0
Coding88.0 ▲76.0
Math93.5 ▲80.0
Reasoning94.2 ▲82.0
Agentic87.0 ▲74.0
Knowledge91.0 ▲81.0
Multimodal97.5 ▲89.0
Long-context99.0 ▲94.0
Output speed88 t/s210 t/s ▲
Output price$10/M$0.3/M ▲
Context window2000K ▲1000K
0 / 4