FLUX.2 MaxvsSimba 3.2

FLUX.2 Max leads the overall Podium Score by 1.4 points (89.2 vs 87.8).Category wins: FLUX.2 Max 2 — 5 Simba 3.2.FLUX.2 Max is the cheaper pick ($0.05/M vs $10/M per 1M output tokens). Simba 3.2 is faster (62 t/s vs 35 t/s).

FLUX.2 MaxDrag slider or hover to compareSimba 3.2
Simba 3.2
87.8
Coding: 62.0 · Speed: 62 t/s
Output Price: $10/M
FLUX.2 Max
89.2
Coding: 0.0 · Speed: 35 t/s
Output Price: $0.05/M
Quick VerdictAggregated 2026 Benchmark Analysis

FLUX.2 Max is rated higher overall with a Podium Score of 89.2 (vs 87.8 for Simba 3.2). In head-to-head domain evaluations, Simba 3.2 outperforms in 5 of 7 benchmark categories.

Coding & Engineering
Simba 3.2 (62.0)
Inference Speed
Simba 3.2 (62 t/s)
Cost Efficiency
FLUX.2 Max ($0.05/M)
API Price / 1M (in · out)
FLUX.2 Max $0.05/M · $0.05/M — Simba 3.2 $2/M · $10/M

Choose FLUX.2 Max for vision and multimodal apps, and Simba 3.2 for complex reasoning and analysis.

MetricFLUX.2 MaxSimba 3.2
Podium Score89.2 ▲87.8
Arena Elo1435 ▲1400
Intelligence Index89.0 ▲62.0
Coding0.062.0 ▲
Math0.084.0 ▲
Reasoning45.088.0 ▲
Agentic30.070.0 ▲
Knowledge65.0 ▲50.0
Multimodal99.4 ▲55.0
Long-context60.075.0 ▲
Output speed35 t/s62 t/s ▲
Output price$0.05/M ▲$10/M
Context window128K262K ▲
Scores aggregated from five independent leaderboards. See Methodology. More head-to-heads: FLUX.2 Max vs Claude Mythos · FLUX.2 Max vs Claude 5.5 Sonnet · FLUX.2 Max vs Kimi K3.1 Pro · FLUX.2 Max vs Eleven Multilingual v3
0 / 4