FLUX.2 MaxvsNVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Super-VL

FLUX.2 Max leads the overall Podium Score by 1.4 points (89.2 vs 87.8).Category wins: FLUX.2 Max 1 — 6 NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Super-VL.FLUX.2 Max is the cheaper pick ($0.05/M vs $1.2/M per 1M output tokens). NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Super-VL is faster (110 t/s vs 35 t/s).

Open in Compare Tool →View FLUX.2 MaxView NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Super-VL
FLUX.2 MaxDrag slider or hover to compareNVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Super-VL
NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Super-VL
87.8
Coding: 83.0 · Speed: 110 t/s
Output Price: $1.2/M
FLUX.2 Max
89.2
Coding: 0.0 · Speed: 35 t/s
Output Price: $0.05/M
Quick VerdictAggregated 2026 Benchmark Analysis

FLUX.2 Max is rated higher overall with a Podium Score of 89.2 (vs 87.8 for NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Super-VL). In head-to-head domain evaluations, NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Super-VL outperforms in 6 of 7 benchmark categories.

Coding & Engineering
NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Super-VL (83.0)
Inference Speed
NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Super-VL (110 t/s)
Cost Efficiency
FLUX.2 Max ($0.05/M)
API Price / 1M (in · out)
FLUX.2 Max $0.05/M · $0.05/M — NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Super-VL $0.35/M · $1.2/M

Choose FLUX.2 Max for vision and multimodal apps, and NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Super-VL for long documents and large codebases.

MetricFLUX.2 MaxNVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Super-VL
Podium Score89.2 ▲87.8
Arena Elo1435 ▲1418
Intelligence Index89.0 ▲88.0
Coding0.083.0 ▲
Math0.084.0 ▲
Reasoning45.086.0 ▲
Agentic30.081.0 ▲
Knowledge65.085.0 ▲
Multimodal99.4 ▲96.0
Long-context60.091.0 ▲
Output speed35 t/s110 t/s ▲
Output price$0.05/M ▲$1.2/M
Context window128K512K ▲
Scores aggregated from five independent leaderboards. See Methodology. More head-to-heads: FLUX.2 Max vs Claude Mythos · FLUX.2 Max vs Claude 5.5 Sonnet · FLUX.2 Max vs Kimi K3.1 Pro · FLUX.2 Max vs Eleven Multilingual v3
0 / 4
Compare Now →