FLUX.2 Klein 9BvsNVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Super-VL

FLUX.2 Klein 9B leads the overall Podium Score by 0.4 points (88.2 vs 87.8).Category wins: FLUX.2 Klein 9B 0 — 7 NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Super-VL.FLUX.2 Klein 9B is the cheaper pick ($0.02/M vs $1.2/M per 1M output tokens). NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Super-VL is faster (110 t/s vs 55 t/s).

FLUX.2 Klein 9BDrag slider or hover to compareNVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Super-VL
NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Super-VL
87.8
Coding: 83.0 · Speed: 110 t/s
Output Price: $1.2/M
FLUX.2 Klein 9B
88.2
Coding: 0.0 · Speed: 55 t/s
Output Price: $0.02/M
Quick VerdictAggregated 2026 Benchmark Analysis

FLUX.2 Klein 9B is rated higher overall with a Podium Score of 88.2 (vs 87.8 for NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Super-VL). In head-to-head domain evaluations, NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Super-VL outperforms in 7 of 7 benchmark categories.

Coding & Engineering
NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Super-VL (83.0)
Inference Speed
NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Super-VL (110 t/s)
Cost Efficiency
FLUX.2 Klein 9B ($0.02/M)
API Price / 1M (in · out)
FLUX.2 Klein 9B $0.02/M · $0.02/M — NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Super-VL $0.35/M · $1.2/M

Choose FLUX.2 Klein 9B for cost-sensitive workloads, and NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Super-VL for vision and multimodal apps.

MetricFLUX.2 Klein 9BNVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Super-VL
Podium Score88.2 ▲87.8
Arena Elo14051418 ▲
Intelligence Index88.088.0
Coding0.083.0 ▲
Math0.084.0 ▲
Reasoning32.086.0 ▲
Agentic22.081.0 ▲
Knowledge50.085.0 ▲
Multimodal94.096.0 ▲
Long-context45.091.0 ▲
Output speed55 t/s110 t/s ▲
Output price$0.02/M ▲$1.2/M
Context window64K512K ▲
0 / 4