Claude Fable 5.1vsMiMo v2.6 Flash

Claude Fable 5.1 is tied with MiMo v2.6 Flash on the Podium Score (88.4).Category wins: Claude Fable 5.1 2 — 2 MiMo v2.6 Flash.MiMo v2.6 Flash is the cheaper pick ($0.3/M vs $15/M per 1M output tokens). MiMo v2.6 Flash is faster (118 t/s vs 85 t/s).

Claude Fable 5.1Drag slider or hover to compareMiMo v2.6 Flash
MiMo v2.6 Flash
88.4
Coding: 86.0 · Speed: 118 t/s
Output Price: $0.3/M
Claude Fable 5.1
88.4
Coding: 95.5 · Speed: 85 t/s
Output Price: $15/M
Quick VerdictAggregated 2026 Benchmark Analysis

Claude Fable 5.1 is rated higher overall with a Podium Score of 88.4 (vs 88.4 for MiMo v2.6 Flash). Both models show closely matched capabilities across domain benchmarks.

Coding & Engineering
Claude Fable 5.1 (95.5)
Inference Speed
MiMo v2.6 Flash (118 t/s)
Cost Efficiency
MiMo v2.6 Flash ($0.3/M)
API Price / 1M (in · out)
Claude Fable 5.1 $3/M · $15/M — MiMo v2.6 Flash $0.1/M · $0.3/M

Choose Claude Fable 5.1 for coding and software engineering, and MiMo v2.6 Flash for vision and multimodal apps.

MetricClaude Fable 5.1MiMo v2.6 Flash
Podium Score88.488.4
Arena Elo—1425
Intelligence Index—88.0
Coding95.5 ▲86.0
Math—85.0
Reasoning92.0 ▲87.0
Agentic—84.0
Knowledge58.084.0 ▲
Multimodal62.087.0 ▲
Long-context—95.0
Output speed85 t/s118 t/s ▲
Output price$15/M$0.3/M ▲
Context window500K1000K ▲
0 / 4