Qwen Audio 3.1 TTS+vsFLUX.2 Max

Qwen Audio 3.1 TTS+ leads the overall Podium Score by 0.2 points (89.4 vs 89.2).Category wins: Qwen Audio 3.1 TTS+ 1 — 4 FLUX.2 Max.Qwen Audio 3.1 TTS+ is the cheaper pick ($0.02/M vs $0.05/M per 1M output tokens). Qwen Audio 3.1 TTS+ is faster (140 t/s vs 35 t/s).

Qwen Audio 3.1 TTS+Drag slider or hover to compareFLUX.2 Max
FLUX.2 Max
89.2
Coding: 0.0 · Speed: 35 t/s
Output Price: $0.05/M
Qwen Audio 3.1 TTS+
89.4
Coding: 0.0 · Speed: 140 t/s
Output Price: $0.02/M
Quick VerdictAggregated 2026 Benchmark Analysis

Qwen Audio 3.1 TTS+ is rated higher overall with a Podium Score of 89.4 (vs 89.2 for FLUX.2 Max). In head-to-head domain evaluations, FLUX.2 Max outperforms in 4 of 7 benchmark categories.

Coding & Engineering
Qwen Audio 3.1 TTS+ (0.0)
Inference Speed
Qwen Audio 3.1 TTS+ (140 t/s)
Cost Efficiency
Qwen Audio 3.1 TTS+ ($0.02/M)
API Price / 1M (in · out)
Qwen Audio 3.1 TTS+ $0.01/M · $0.02/M — FLUX.2 Max $0.05/M · $0.05/M

Choose Qwen Audio 3.1 TTS+ for autonomous agents and tool use, and FLUX.2 Max for vision and multimodal apps.

MetricQwen Audio 3.1 TTS+FLUX.2 Max
Podium Score89.4 ▲89.2
Arena Elo14301435 ▲
Intelligence Index89.089.0
Coding0.00.0
Math0.00.0
Reasoning30.045.0 ▲
Agentic50.0 ▲30.0
Knowledge45.065.0 ▲
Multimodal86.099.4 ▲
Long-context45.060.0 ▲
Output speed140 t/s ▲35 t/s
Output price$0.02/M ▲$0.05/M
Context window32K128K ▲
0 / 4