Kimi K3.1 ProvsClaude Fable 5

Kimi K3.1 Pro leads the overall Podium Score by 0.8 points (94.2 vs 93.4).Category wins: Kimi K3.1 Pro 3 — 2 Claude Fable 5.Kimi K3.1 Pro is the cheaper pick ($20/M vs $50/M per 1M output tokens). Claude Fable 5 is faster (71 t/s vs 45 t/s).

Kimi K3.1 ProDrag slider or hover to compareClaude Fable 5
Claude Fable 5
93.4
Coding: 84.1 · Speed: 71 t/s
Output Price: $50/M
Kimi K3.1 Pro
94.2
Coding: 72.0 · Speed: 45 t/s
Output Price: $20/M
Quick VerdictAggregated 2026 Benchmark Analysis

Kimi K3.1 Pro is rated higher overall with a Podium Score of 94.2 (vs 93.4 for Claude Fable 5). In head-to-head domain evaluations, Kimi K3.1 Pro outperforms in 3 of 7 benchmark categories.

Coding & Engineering
Claude Fable 5 (84.1)
Inference Speed
Claude Fable 5 (71 t/s)
Cost Efficiency
Kimi K3.1 Pro ($20/M)
API Price / 1M (in · out)
Kimi K3.1 Pro $4/M · $20/M — Claude Fable 5 $10/M · $50/M

Choose Kimi K3.1 Pro for long documents and large codebases, and Claude Fable 5 for autonomous agents and tool use.

MetricKimi K3.1 ProClaude Fable 5
Podium Score94.2 ▲93.4
Arena Elo14901509 ▲
Intelligence Index68.0 ▲60.0
Coding72.084.1 ▲
Math95.0—
Reasoning98.0 ▲81.0
Agentic82.096.2 ▲
Knowledge45.0 ▲43.3
Multimodal96.0—
Long-context100.0 ▲99.2
Output speed45 t/s71 t/s ▲
Output price$20/M ▲$50/M
Context window1000K1000K
0 / 4