Claude Opus 4.8vsSeed Oss 36b Instruct

Claude Opus 4.8 leads the overall Podium Score by 57.5 points (76.0 vs 18.5).Category wins: Claude Opus 4.8 3 — 1 Seed Oss 36b Instruct.Seed Oss 36b Instruct is the cheaper pick ($3/M vs $15/M per 1M output tokens). Seed Oss 36b Instruct is faster (60 t/s vs 50 t/s).

Key VerdictAggregated 2026 Benchmark Analysis

Claude Opus 4.8 is rated higher overall with a Podium Score of 76.0 (vs 18.5 for Seed Oss 36b Instruct). In head-to-head domain evaluations, Claude Opus 4.8 outperforms in 3 of 7 benchmark categories.

Coding & Engineering
Claude Opus 4.8 (58.0)
Inference Speed
Seed Oss 36b Instruct (60 t/s)
Cost Efficiency
Seed Oss 36b Instruct ($3/M/M)
MetricClaude Opus 4.8Seed Oss 36b Instruct
Podium Score76.0 ▲18.5
Arena Elo1484
Intelligence Index55.7
Coding58.0 ▲40.0
Math58.7
Reasoning82.8 ▲35.0
Agentic74.9
Knowledge28.845.0 ▲
Multimodal89.6 ▲30.0
Long-context99.2
Output speed50 t/s60 t/s ▲
Output price$15/M$3/M ▲
Context window1000K ▲131K
Scores aggregated from five independent leaderboards. See Methodology. More head-to-heads: Claude Opus 4.8 vs Claude Mythos · Claude Opus 4.8 vs Claude Fable 5 · Claude Opus 4.8 vs Kimi K3 · Claude Opus 4.8 vs Claude Opus 5
0 / 4 Models Selected