Step 2 16k Exp 202412vsPhi 3 Small 8k Instruct
Step 2 16k Exp 202412 leads the overall Podium Score by 8.0 points (67.0 vs 59.0).Category wins: Step 2 16k Exp 202412 0 — 0 Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct.Step 2 16k Exp 202412 is the cheaper pick ($3/M vs $3/M per 1M output tokens). Step 2 16k Exp 202412 is faster (50 t/s vs 50 t/s).
Key VerdictAggregated 2026 Benchmark Analysis
Step 2 16k Exp 202412 is rated higher overall with a Podium Score of 67.0 (vs 59.0 for Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct). Both models show closely matched capabilities across domain benchmarks.
Coding & Engineering
Comparable
Inference Speed
Step 2 16k Exp 202412 (50 t/s)
Cost Efficiency
Step 2 16k Exp 202412 ($3/M/M)
| Metric | Step 2 16k Exp 202412 | Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Podium Score | 67.0 ▲ | 59.0 |
| Arena Elo | — | — |
| Intelligence Index | — | — |
| Coding | — | — |
| Math | — | — |
| Reasoning | — | — |
| Agentic | — | — |
| Knowledge | — | — |
| Multimodal | — | — |
| Long-context | — | — |
| Output speed | 50 t/s | 50 t/s |
| Output price | $3/M | $3/M |
| Context window | 128K | 128K |
Scores aggregated from five independent leaderboards. See Methodology. More head-to-heads: Step 2 16k Exp vs Claude Mythos · Step 2 16k Exp vs Claude Fable 5 · Step 2 16k Exp vs Kimi K3 · Step 2 16k Exp vs Claude Opus 5