Qwen3.6 Max PreviewvsClaude Opus 4 20250514 Thinking 16k

Qwen3.6 Max Preview leads the overall Podium Score by 2.0 points (73.0 vs 71.0).Category wins: Qwen3.6 Max Preview 0 — 0 Claude Opus 4 20250514 Thinking 16k.Qwen3.6 Max Preview is the cheaper pick ($2/M vs $15/M per 1M output tokens). Qwen3.6 Max Preview is faster (50 t/s vs 50 t/s).

Key VerdictAggregated 2026 Benchmark Analysis

Qwen3.6 Max Preview is rated higher overall with a Podium Score of 73.0 (vs 71.0 for Claude Opus 4 20250514 Thinking 16k). Both models show closely matched capabilities across domain benchmarks.

Coding & Engineering
Comparable
Inference Speed
Qwen3.6 Max Preview (50 t/s)
Cost Efficiency
Qwen3.6 Max Preview ($2/M/M)
MetricQwen3.6 Max PreviewClaude Opus 4 20250514 Thinking 16k
Podium Score73.0 ▲71.0
Arena Elo
Intelligence Index
Coding
Math
Reasoning
Agentic
Knowledge
Multimodal
Long-context
Output speed50 t/s50 t/s
Output price$2/M ▲$15/M
Context window128K128K
Scores aggregated from five independent leaderboards. See Methodology. More head-to-heads: Qwen3.6 Max vs Claude Mythos · Qwen3.6 Max vs Claude Fable 5 · Qwen3.6 Max vs Kimi K3 · Qwen3.6 Max vs Claude Opus 5
0 / 4 Models Selected