Kimi K2 Thinking TurbovsSeed Oss 36b Instruct

Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads the overall Podium Score by 53.5 points (72.0 vs 18.5).Category wins: Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo 0 — 0 Seed Oss 36b Instruct.Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo is the cheaper pick ($3/M vs $3/M per 1M output tokens). Seed Oss 36b Instruct is faster (60 t/s vs 50 t/s).

Key VerdictAggregated 2026 Benchmark Analysis

Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo is rated higher overall with a Podium Score of 72.0 (vs 18.5 for Seed Oss 36b Instruct). Both models show closely matched capabilities across domain benchmarks.

Coding & Engineering
Comparable
Inference Speed
Seed Oss 36b Instruct (60 t/s)
Cost Efficiency
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo ($3/M/M)
MetricKimi K2 Thinking TurboSeed Oss 36b Instruct
Podium Score72.0 ▲18.5
Arena Elo
Intelligence Index
Coding40.0
Math
Reasoning35.0
Agentic
Knowledge45.0
Multimodal30.0
Long-context
Output speed50 t/s60 t/s ▲
Output price$3/M$3/M
Context window128K131K ▲
Scores aggregated from five independent leaderboards. See Methodology. More head-to-heads: Kimi K2 T Turbo vs Claude Mythos · Kimi K2 T Turbo vs Claude Fable 5 · Kimi K2 T Turbo vs Kimi K3 · Kimi K2 T Turbo vs Claude Opus 5
0 / 4 Models Selected