Grok 4.20 Beta1vsLongcat Flash Chat 2602 Exp
Grok 4.20 Beta1 leads the overall Podium Score by 2.0 points (74.0 vs 72.0).Category wins: Grok 4.20 Beta1 0 — 0 Longcat Flash Chat 2602 Exp.Longcat Flash Chat 2602 Exp is the cheaper pick ($3/M vs $15/M per 1M output tokens). Grok 4.20 Beta1 is faster (50 t/s vs 50 t/s).
Key VerdictAggregated 2026 Benchmark Analysis
Grok 4.20 Beta1 is rated higher overall with a Podium Score of 74.0 (vs 72.0 for Longcat Flash Chat 2602 Exp). Both models show closely matched capabilities across domain benchmarks.
Coding & Engineering
Comparable
Inference Speed
Grok 4.20 Beta1 (50 t/s)
Cost Efficiency
Longcat Flash Chat 2602 Exp ($3/M/M)
| Metric | Grok 4.20 Beta1 | Longcat Flash Chat 2602 Exp |
|---|---|---|
| Podium Score | 74.0 ▲ | 72.0 |
| Arena Elo | — | — |
| Intelligence Index | — | — |
| Coding | — | — |
| Math | — | — |
| Reasoning | — | — |
| Agentic | — | — |
| Knowledge | — | — |
| Multimodal | — | — |
| Long-context | — | — |
| Output speed | 50 t/s | 50 t/s |
| Output price | $15/M | $3/M ▲ |
| Context window | 128K | 128K |
Scores aggregated from five independent leaderboards. See Methodology. More head-to-heads: Grok 4.20 Beta1 vs Claude Mythos · Grok 4.20 Beta1 vs Claude Fable 5 · Grok 4.20 Beta1 vs Kimi K3 · Grok 4.20 Beta1 vs Claude Opus 5