DeepSeekvsLlama

Comparing DeepSeek and Meta. Average Podium Score across top models: DeepSeek (71.6) vs Llama (67.4). Flagship showdown: Deepseek V4 Pro High Preview (73.0) vs Muse Spark 1.1 (69.9).

DeepSeek (DeepSeek)

High-efficiency, cost-effective reasoning and coding open-weight models.

Avg Score: 71.6
Licensing: Open Weights Available

Llama (Meta)

The global standard in open-weights foundation models from Meta AI.

Top Model: Muse Spark 1.1
Avg Score: 67.4
Licensing: Open Weights Available

Top Models Showdown

RankModelLabScoreCodingReasoningSpeedPrice / 1M
#1Deepseek V4 Pro High PreviewDeepSeek73.050 t/s$1.1/M
#2Deepseek V4 Flash High PreviewDeepSeek72.050 t/s$1.1/M
#3Deepseek V3.2 Exp ThinkingDeepSeek71.050 t/s$1.1/M
#4Deepseek V3.2 ThinkingDeepSeek71.050 t/s$1.1/M
#5Deepseek V3.2 ExpDeepSeek71.050 t/s$1.1/M
#6Muse Spark 1.1Meta69.964.462.7208 t/s$4.25/M
#7Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b V1Meta67.050 t/s$0/M
#8Llama 3.1 405b Instruct Bf16Meta67.050 t/s$0/M
#9Llama 3.1 405b Instruct Fp8Meta67.050 t/s$0/M
#10Llama 3.3 Nemotron 49b Super V1Meta66.050 t/s$0/M
0 / 4 Models Selected