Deepseek V3.2 ThinkingvsMuse Spark 1.1
Deepseek V3.2 Thinking leads the overall Podium Score by 1.1 points (71.0 vs 69.9).Category wins: Deepseek V3.2 Thinking 0 — 0 Muse Spark 1.1.Deepseek V3.2 Thinking is the cheaper pick ($1.1/M vs $4.25/M per 1M output tokens). Muse Spark 1.1 is faster (208 t/s vs 50 t/s).
Key VerdictAggregated 2026 Benchmark Analysis
Deepseek V3.2 Thinking is rated higher overall with a Podium Score of 71.0 (vs 69.9 for Muse Spark 1.1). Both models show closely matched capabilities across domain benchmarks.
Coding & Engineering
Comparable
Inference Speed
Muse Spark 1.1 (208 t/s)
Cost Efficiency
Deepseek V3.2 Thinking ($1.1/M/M)
| Metric | Deepseek V3.2 Thinking | Muse Spark 1.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Podium Score | 71.0 ▲ | 69.9 |
| Arena Elo | — | 1490 |
| Intelligence Index | — | 51.0 |
| Coding | — | 64.4 |
| Math | — | — |
| Reasoning | — | 62.7 |
| Agentic | — | — |
| Knowledge | — | 28.1 |
| Multimodal | — | — |
| Long-context | — | 99.2 |
| Output speed | 50 t/s | 208 t/s ▲ |
| Output price | $1.1/M ▲ | $4.25/M |
| Context window | 128K | 1000K ▲ |
Scores aggregated from five independent leaderboards. See Methodology. More head-to-heads: Deepseek V3.2 T vs Claude Mythos · Deepseek V3.2 T vs Claude Fable 5 · Deepseek V3.2 T vs Kimi K3 · Deepseek V3.2 T vs Claude Opus 5