Claude Sonnet 4 5 20250929vsClaude Opus 4 20250514 Thinking 16k

Claude Sonnet 4 5 20250929 leads the overall Podium Score by 2.0 points (73.0 vs 71.0).Category wins: Claude Sonnet 4 5 20250929 0 — 0 Claude Opus 4 20250514 Thinking 16k.Claude Sonnet 4 5 20250929 is the cheaper pick ($15/M vs $15/M per 1M output tokens). Claude Sonnet 4 5 20250929 is faster (50 t/s vs 50 t/s).

Key VerdictAggregated 2026 Benchmark Analysis

Claude Sonnet 4 5 20250929 is rated higher overall with a Podium Score of 73.0 (vs 71.0 for Claude Opus 4 20250514 Thinking 16k). Both models show closely matched capabilities across domain benchmarks.

Coding & Engineering
Comparable
Inference Speed
Claude Sonnet 4 5 20250929 (50 t/s)
Cost Efficiency
Claude Sonnet 4 5 20250929 ($15/M/M)
MetricClaude Sonnet 4 5 20250929Claude Opus 4 20250514 Thinking 16k
Podium Score73.0 ▲71.0
Arena Elo
Intelligence Index
Coding
Math
Reasoning
Agentic
Knowledge
Multimodal
Long-context
Output speed50 t/s50 t/s
Output price$15/M$15/M
Context window128K128K
0 / 4 Models Selected