Claude Opus 4 5 20251101 Thinking 32kvsMuse Spark 1.1
Claude Opus 4 5 20251101 Thinking 32k leads the overall Podium Score by 4.1 points (74.0 vs 69.9).Category wins: Claude Opus 4 5 20251101 Thinking 32k 0 — 0 Muse Spark 1.1.Muse Spark 1.1 is the cheaper pick ($4.25/M vs $15/M per 1M output tokens). Muse Spark 1.1 is faster (208 t/s vs 50 t/s).
Key VerdictAggregated 2026 Benchmark Analysis
Claude Opus 4 5 20251101 Thinking 32k is rated higher overall with a Podium Score of 74.0 (vs 69.9 for Muse Spark 1.1). Both models show closely matched capabilities across domain benchmarks.
Coding & Engineering
Comparable
Inference Speed
Muse Spark 1.1 (208 t/s)
Cost Efficiency
Muse Spark 1.1 ($4.25/M/M)
| Metric | Claude Opus 4 5 20251101 Thinking 32k | Muse Spark 1.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Podium Score | 74.0 ▲ | 69.9 |
| Arena Elo | — | 1490 |
| Intelligence Index | — | 51.0 |
| Coding | — | 64.4 |
| Math | — | — |
| Reasoning | — | 62.7 |
| Agentic | — | — |
| Knowledge | — | 28.1 |
| Multimodal | — | — |
| Long-context | — | 99.2 |
| Output speed | 50 t/s | 208 t/s ▲ |
| Output price | $15/M | $4.25/M ▲ |
| Context window | 128K | 1000K ▲ |
Scores aggregated from five independent leaderboards. See Methodology. More head-to-heads: Claude Opus 4 5 32k vs Claude Mythos · Claude Opus 4 5 32k vs Claude Fable 5 · Claude Opus 4 5 32k vs Kimi K3 · Claude Opus 4 5 32k vs Claude Opus 5