Claude Opus 4 1 20250805vsNvidia Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49b V1.5

Claude Opus 4 1 20250805 leads the overall Podium Score by 5.0 points (72.0 vs 67.0).Category wins: Claude Opus 4 1 20250805 0 — 0 Nvidia Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49b V1.5.Nvidia Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49b V1.5 is the cheaper pick ($3/M vs $15/M per 1M output tokens). Claude Opus 4 1 20250805 is faster (50 t/s vs 50 t/s).

Key VerdictAggregated 2026 Benchmark Analysis

Claude Opus 4 1 20250805 is rated higher overall with a Podium Score of 72.0 (vs 67.0 for Nvidia Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49b V1.5). Both models show closely matched capabilities across domain benchmarks.

Coding & Engineering
Comparable
Inference Speed
Claude Opus 4 1 20250805 (50 t/s)
Cost Efficiency
Nvidia Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49b V1.5 ($3/M/M)
MetricClaude Opus 4 1 20250805Nvidia Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49b V1.5
Podium Score72.0 ▲67.0
Arena Elo
Intelligence Index
Coding
Math
Reasoning
Agentic
Knowledge
Multimodal
Long-context
Output speed50 t/s50 t/s
Output price$15/M$3/M ▲
Context window128K128K
Scores aggregated from five independent leaderboards. See Methodology. More head-to-heads: Claude Opus 4 1 vs Claude Mythos · Claude Opus 4 1 vs Claude Fable 5 · Claude Opus 4 1 vs Kimi K3 · Claude Opus 4 1 vs Claude Opus 5
0 / 4 Models Selected