模型对比

GPT-6 Astra 对决 Claude Fable 5.1:基准跑分与价格对比

Quick Verdict: GPT-6 Astra and Claude Fable 5.1 represent the dual peaks of frontier artificial intelligence in late 2026. GPT-6 Astra wins on computer use (OSWorld 72.6%), cybersecurity (ExploitBench 100%, Critical tier), and hard math (FrontierMath T4 97.6%). Claude Fable 5.1 leads on independent coding agent benchmarks (Coding Agent Index 70 vs 67), Humanity's Last Exam (65.0% vs 57.2%), and offers $0.25/M cache reads (vs $1.00 on Astra) for long-running workflows.

1. Executive Summary & Benchmark Scorecard

Both OpenAI and Anthropic launched their flagship frontier reasoning architectures in September 2026. While both models list at $10.00 / 1M input and $50.00 / 1M output, their strengths diverge sharply across specialized disciplines:

Benchmark / Metric OpenAI GPT-6 Astra Anthropic Claude Fable 5.1 Category Winner
FrontierMath Tier 4 97.6% 87.8% GPT-6 Astra (+9.8%)
ExploitBench (Vulnerability Analysis) 100% 70.0% GPT-6 Astra (Critical Tier)
OSWorld 2.0 (Computer Use) 72.6% 68.4% GPT-6 Astra
Humanity's Last Exam (HLE w/ tools) 57.2% 65.0% Claude Fable 5.1 (+7.8%)
Terminal-Bench Science 0.1 64.6% 52.6% GPT-6 Astra (+12.0%)
Independent Intelligence Index (AA) 61 66 Claude Fable 5.1
SWE-Bench Verified 90.2% 89.8% Statistically Tied
Prompt Cache Read (per 1M) $1.00 $0.25 Claude Fable 5.1 (4x cheaper)
Max Context Window 1,100,000 (1.1M) 1,000,000 (1.0M) GPT-6 Astra

2. Autonomous Cybersecurity & ExploitBench

One of the most consequential differentiators of GPT-6 Astra is being the first model designated as Critical Tier under OpenAI's Preparedness Framework. In automated penetration testing and zero-day chain recreation, Astra achieved a 100% resolution rate on ExploitBench, demonstrating autonomous end-to-end vulnerability discovery across complex software architectures.

3. Token Economics & Prompt Caching

While base rates are identical ($10 input / $50 output), effective task costs diverge in production:

  • Long-Running Coding Agents: Claude Fable 5.1's $0.25 cached token rate reduces repetitive context costs by up to 75% in harness tools like Claude Code and OpenCode.
  • Output Conciseness: GPT-6 Astra generates up to 2.4x fewer reasoning tokens to solve identical mathematics and engineering tasks, lowering overall blended cost per completed task to $1.67 versus $3.76 on complex workflows.

4. Final Architectural Recommendation

  • Choose GPT-6 Astra: When building autonomous cybersecurity tools, scientific terminal agents, computer-use automation, or solving research-level mathematical proofs.
  • Choose Claude Fable 5.1: When operating multi-turn agentic coding repositories where deep context caching dominates total spend, or multidisciplinary research requiring maximum general intelligence scores.
← 返回所有文章
0 / 4