Alibaba

Qwen3.8 27B (Non-reasoning)Open

Alibaba Qwen3.8 27B (Non-reasoning) model with 260K context window, optimized for advanced reasoning and multimodal tasks.

#250released Aug 14, 2026·Open Weights·27 billion
textimagevideo260K ctxreasoning
API providersGet API Key →Leaderboard
Intelligence
65.0 #250
AAQI 30.0
Output Speed
62 t/s
TTFT 3.06 s · ITL 16.1 ms/tok
Blended price (3:1)
$1.125 /1M
In $0.5/M · Out $3/M
Context
260K
≈ 650 A4 pages · max out 16,384

Quality Domain Radar

6-Axis Frontier Evaluation vs Category Average & Flagship

Qwen3.8 27B (Non-reasoning)
Claude Mythos Preview (#1)
Average (68)
Coding (68)Mathematics (39)Hard Science (GPQA) (45)Agentic & Tool Use (36)Knowledge (MMLU) (39)Vision / Multimodal (36)

Radar axes are approximated from category scores where direct benchmark measurements are missing — see Methodology.

API deployment

Compare hosts & latency

Throughput, TTFT and cache pricing across Groq, Cerebras, Together, DeepInfra, Fireworks, Bedrock and Azure.

GroqCerebrasTogether AIDeepInfraFireworks AIAWS BedrockAzure AI
View providers matrix →

Scores by Source

Model Details

Release date
Aug 14, 2026
Parameters
27 billion
License
Open Weights
Context Window
260,000 tokens
Input Price
$0.5/M
Output Price
$3/M
Output Speed
62 t/s
Time to First Token
3.06 s

Estimated monthly bill

Estimated monthly spend
$0.00
Calculating savings vs GPT-4o...

Cite & embed

GitHub Markdown badge
Loading badge markdown...
BibTeX
@misc{llmpodium2026qwen3827bnonreasoning,
  title = {Benchmark Analysis and Intelligence Evaluation of Qwen3.8 27B (Non-reasoning)},
  author = {LLMPodium Research},
  year = {2026},
  url = {https://llmpodium.com/models/qwen3-8-27b-non-reasoning}
}

Embed Score Badge

Add a live Podium Score badge to your GitHub or Hugging Face README — it links back to the live ranking.

Preview
Qwen3.8 27B (Non-reasoning) LLMPodium Score
Markdown
Loading badge snippet...
HTML
Loading badge snippet...

More from Alibaba

Alternative Models

Closest alternatives to Qwen3.8 27B (Non-reasoning) based on capabilities, pricing, and benchmark scores.

0 / 4